There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
Noam ChomskyRead
In the 1930s, unemployed working people could anticipate that their jobs would come back.
Interpretation
The quote reflects a time when job loss was seen as temporary and hopeful optimism about economic recovery was prevalent.
Noam Chomsky's quote highlights the belief during the 1930s, particularly among unemployed workers, that the economic hardships caused by the Great Depression would eventually ease, allowing them to regain their jobs. This sentiment speaks to a collective hope and resilience that defined that era, suggesting that people had faith in the eventual return of stability and opportunity in the labor market.
In practice
In a speech about economic recovery, one could quote Chomsky to highlight the importance of optimism during tough times.
There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise, not from defects in their Constitution or Confederation, not from want of honor or virtue, so much as from the downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit and circulation.
Thus, the weight of my criticism is directed against the inadequacy of the theoretical foundations of the laissez-faire doctrine upon which I was brought up and for many years I taught
Policy makers should be compelled to take action given the serious costs of long-term unemployment when overall unemployment is already high. A week of unemployment is worse when it is experienced as part of a longer spell.
The market is incredibly inefficient and capable on rare occasions of being utterly dysfunctional. And people have a really hard time getting their brain around that fact. They want to believe that it's approximately efficient almost all the time, and it simply isn't true.
There is slow growth, but it is positive slow growth. At the same time, ratios of debt-to-incomes go down. That's a beautiful deleveraging.
Eviction is part of a business model at the bottom of the market.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.