When will Labour learn that you cannot build Jerusalem in Brussels.
Margaret ThatcherRead
Adam Smith's 'invisible hand' is not above sudden, disturbing, movements. Since its inception, capitalism has known slumps and recessions, bubble and froth; no one has yet dis-invented the business cycle, and probably no one will; and what Schumpeter famously called the 'gales of creative destruction' still roar mightily from time to time. To lament these things is ultimately to lament the bracing blast of freedom itself.
Interpretation
This quote reflects on the unpredictable nature of capitalism and the essential role of freedom in driving economic change.
Margaret Thatcher discusses the inherent volatility of capitalism, acknowledging that fluctuations like slumps, recessions, and the 'gales of creative destruction' are part of a dynamic economic system. Rather than lamenting these upheavals, she emphasizes that they are a necessary consequence of the freedom that capitalism provides, suggesting that growth and innovation often arise from challenges and disruptions.
In practice
This quote could be used in a speech advocating for economic reforms.
When will Labour learn that you cannot build Jerusalem in Brussels.
Never in the history of human credit has so much been owed.
The battle for women's rights has been largely won.
Ought we not to ask the media to agree among themselves a voluntary code of conduct, under which they would not say or show anything which could assist the terrorists' morale or their cause while the hijack lasted.
Israel must never be expected to jeopardize her security: if she was ever foolish enough to do so, and then suffered for it, the backlash against both honest brokers and Palestinians would be immense - 'land for peace' must also bring peace.
If it's me against 48, I feel sorry for the 48.
Many markets work best with little or no outside interference. But others - especially those subject to big 'externalities' - need a helping hand.
In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value.
If we want corporations to act differently, we have to force them to do so through laws that are fully enforced and through penalties higher than the economic benefits of thwarting the laws.
Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world. Fiat money in extremis is accepted by nobody. Gold is always accepted.
There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved.
When the word 'morality' comes up in connection with economics, income distribution and financial stability are usually the issues. Is it moral for rich countries to use such a high proportion of the world's resources or for investment bankers to earn large bonuses?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.