We try to make buildings last long and be resilient but also be not so idiosyncratic that they can't change.
Elizabeth DillerRead
We're always taught that we're building for permanence, but why? I like the idea of a prosthetic architecture! When a section is removed, the building readjusts its weight distribution, like a living body.
Interpretation
This quote suggests that buildings and structures can be dynamic and adaptable, rather than fixed and permanent.
Elizabeth Diller highlights the concept of 'prosthetic architecture', which embraces the idea that structures should evolve and adapt rather than strive for unchanging permanence. This perspective allows architecture to be viewed as a living entity that can adjust and reconfigure itself, akin to how a body responds to change or loss, promoting flexibility and resilience in design.
In practice
This quote could inspire debate in an architecture class about the future of building design.
We try to make buildings last long and be resilient but also be not so idiosyncratic that they can't change.
Aside from keeping the rain out and producing some usable space, architecture is nothing but a special-effects machine that delights and disturbs the senses.
It is difficult to design a space that will not attract people. What is remarkable is how often this has been accomplished.
All buildings, large or small, public or private, have a public face, a facade; they therefore, without exception, have a positive or negative effect on the quality of the public realm, enriching or impoverishing it in a lasting and radical manner. The architecture of the city and public space is a matter of common concern to the same degree as laws and language—they are the foundation of civility and civilisation.
Light creates ambience and feel of a place, as well as the expression of a structure.
The space within becomes the reality of the building.
What is now called 'green architecture' is an opportunistic caricature of a much deeper consideration of the issues related to sustainability that architecture has been engaged with for many years. It was one of the first professions that was deeply concerned with these issues and that had an intellectual response to them.
People can inhabit anything. And they can be miserable in anything and ecstatic in anything. More and more I think that architecture has nothing to do with it. Of course, that's both liberating and alarming.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.