Politics determines who has the power, not who has the truth.
For most Americans, economic growth is a spectator sport.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote implies that many Americans passively observe economic growth rather than actively participating in it.
Paul Krugman's quote suggests that a significant portion of the American population does not engage directly in the processes that drive economic growth, instead viewing it from the sidelines as if it were a sport. This reflects a broader commentary on the disconnect between individuals and the economic systems that affect their lives, highlighting issues of inequality and disempowerment in the economic sphere.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a discussion about the economy at a community meeting, one might reference this quote to highlight the necessity for active participation.
More from Paul Krugman
All quotes →Our popular economics writers, however, are not in the business of giving their readers a ringside seat on the research action; with no exception I can think of, they use their books to do an end run around the normal structure of scholarship, to preach ideas that few serious economists share. Often, these ideas are not just at odds with the professional consensus; they are demonstrably wrong, and sometimes terminally silly. But they sound good to the unwary reader.
The raw fact is that every successful example of economic development this past century ... has taken place via globalization.
Wealthy Americans who benefit hugely from a system rigged in their favor react with hysteria to anyone who points out just how rigged the system is.
It’s not about the budget; it’s about the power...So will the attack on unions succeed? I don’t know. But anyone who cares about retaining government of the people by the people should hope that it doesn’t.
The economics profession went astray because economists, as a group, mistook beauty, clad in impressive-looking mathematics, for truth.
Similar quotes
Measures which serve to abridge the free competition of foreign Articles, have a tendency to occasion an enhancement of prices.
Regulation has gone astray. . . . Either because they have become captives of regulated industries or captains of outmoded administrative agencies, regulators all too often encourage or approve unreasonably high prices, inadequate service, and anticompetitive behavior. The cost of this regulation is always passed on to the consumer. And that cost is astronomical.
What do you think a stimulus is? It’s spending - that's the whole point! Seriously.
Why does a public discussion of economic policy so often show the abysmal ignorance of the participants?
The Fed was largely responsible for converting what might have been a garden-variety recession, although perhaps a fairly severe one, into a major catastrophe. Instead of using its powers to offset the depression, it presided over a decline in the quantity of money by one-third from 1929 to 1933 ... Far from the depression being a failure of the free-enterprise system, it was a tragic failure of government.
Unless we understand what it is that leads to economic and financial instability, we cannot prescribe -- make policy -- to modify or eliminate it. Identifying a phenomenon is not enough; we need a theory that makes instability a normal result in our economy and gives us handles to control it.