At the simplest level, economics can better show us the consequences of our actions. Less simple are cases in which we don't have the knowledge to predict the full consequences. Global warming and climate change are examples.
Edmund PhelpsRead
No amount of debt restructuring, even debt forgiveness, will help the Greeks achieve real prosperity. What they need is not short-term relief but, rather, a long-term cure.
Interpretation
True prosperity requires long-term solutions rather than temporary fixes for financial issues.
In this quote, Edmund Phelps emphasizes that Greece's economic troubles cannot be solved simply through measures like debt restructuring or forgiveness. Instead, a more sustainable approach focused on long-term economic growth and structural reforms is essential for ensuring genuine prosperity and stability in the future.
In practice
In a discussion about economic recovery plans, one might reference this quote to highlight the need for sustainable solutions.
At the simplest level, economics can better show us the consequences of our actions. Less simple are cases in which we don't have the knowledge to predict the full consequences. Global warming and climate change are examples.
If every effect of any new products or methods were required to be known before they could be produced and marketed, they would not be true innovations - and thus not represent new knowledge of what people would like, if offered.
The good life, as it is popularly conceived, typically involves acquiring mastery in one's work, thus gaining for oneself better terms - or means to rewards, whether material, like wealth, or nonmaterial - an experience we may call 'prospering.'
The epic story of the West is the development in the 19th century of a mass prosperity the world had never seen and its near-disappearance in one nation after another in the 20th.
Entrepreneurs have only the murkiest picture of the future in which they are making their bets, and also there is ambiguity: they don't know when they push this lever or that lever that the outcome is going to be what they think it is going to be - there is the law of unanticipated consequences.
When the word 'morality' comes up in connection with economics, income distribution and financial stability are usually the issues. Is it moral for rich countries to use such a high proportion of the world's resources or for investment bankers to earn large bonuses?
When you bring in multi-brand retail items into the country, you're not just bringing the products, but you're also harming local manufacturers.
The world needs banking but it does not need banks.
The need of a constantly expanding market for its products chases the bourgeoisie over the entire surface of the globe.
There is no easy fix or youth unemployment. Partnership between the public and private sectors can make a big difference.
Those on the downside of rising economic inequality generally do not want government policies that look like handouts. They typically do not want the government to make the tax system more progressive, to impose punishing taxes on the rich, in order to give the money to them. Redistribution feels demeaning. It feels like being labeled a failure.
Sector-specific price declines, uncomfortable as they may be for producers in that sector, are generally not a problem for the economy as a whole and do not constitute deflation.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.