I went to the bank and proposed that they lend money to the poor people. The bankers almost fell over.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the unexpected challenge of proposing financial support for the poor to traditional banking institutions.
Muhammad Yunus, known for his work in microfinance, reflects on the skepticism he faced when suggesting that banks could lend to impoverished individuals. This statement underscores the prevailing belief within the banking sector that low-income individuals are not viable borrowers, thus revealing the disconnect between financial institutions and underserved populations. Yunus's proposal indicates a need for innovative approaches to finance that prioritize social impact over conventional profit-driven motives.
In practice
In a discussion about social entrepreneurship, this quote can illustrate the importance of innovative financing for marginalized communities.
Civilization has given us enormous successes: going to the moon, technology. But then this is the civilisation that took us to debt, environmental crisis, every single crisis. We need a civilization where we say goodbye to these things.
What I did not know yet about hunger, but would find out over the next twenty-one years, was that brilliant theorists of economics do not find it worthwhile to spend time discussing issues of poverty and hunger. They believe that these will be resolved when general economic prosperity increases. These economists spend all their talents detailing the process of development and prosperity, but rarely reflect on the origin and development of poverty and hunger. A a result, poverty continues.
People.. were poor not because they were stupid or lazy. They worked all day long, doing complex physical tasks. They were poor because the financial institution in the country did not help them widen their economic base.
Some people think that poor people are lazy. Actually, it takes a lot of work to survive when you are dirt-poor.
Once poverty is gone, we'll need to build museums to display its horrors to future generations. They'll wonder why poverty continued so long in human society - how a few people could live in luxury while billions dwelt in misery, deprivation and despair.
By simply capitalizing on core strengths and knowledge, companies and entrepreneurs can engage in an emerging business model that will enable them to create - and demonstrate - real, sustainable social impact in society.
Those on the downside of rising economic inequality generally do not want government policies that look like handouts. They typically do not want the government to make the tax system more progressive, to impose punishing taxes on the rich, in order to give the money to them. Redistribution feels demeaning. It feels like being labeled a failure.
Printing money is merely taxation in another form. Rather than robbing citizens of their money, government robs their money of its purchasing power.
Every dollar released from taxation that is spared or invested will help create a new job and a new salary.
If a financial institution has business operations in the United States, hires people in the United States, if they are clogged with illiquid assets, they have the same impact on the American people as any other institution.
Instead of abandoning competition and giving banks protected monopolies once again, the public would be better served by making it easier to close banks when they get into trouble. Instead of making banking boring, let us make it a normal industry, susceptible to destruction in the face of creativity.
The tendency of a national bank is to increase public and private credit. The former gives power to the state, for the protection of its rights and interests: and the latter facilitates and extends the operations of commerce among individuals. Industry is increased, commodities are multiplied, agriculture and manufacturers flourish: and herein consists the true wealth and prosperity of a state.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.