Any man whose errors take ten years to correct is quite a man.
J. Robert OppenheimerRead
Bertrand Russell had given a talk on the then new quantum mechanics, of whose wonders he was most appreciative. He spoke hard and earnestly in the New Lecture Hall. And when he was done, Professor Whitehead, who presided, thanked him for his efforts, and not least for 'leaving the vast darkness of the subject unobscured'.
Interpretation
The quote reflects on the complexities of quantum mechanics and the challenge of making profound subjects comprehensible.
This quote highlights the difficulty inherent in explaining advanced scientific concepts, such as quantum mechanics, which are often shrouded in complexity and ambiguity. Bertrand Russell's earnest attempt to discuss these ideas is acknowledged by Professor Whitehead, who appreciates that despite efforts to illuminate the topic, some aspects remain obscured, emphasizing the limits of human understanding in the face of scientific wonders.
In practice
In a lecture on advanced physics, to illustrate the challenges of teaching complex topics.
Any man whose errors take ten years to correct is quite a man.
There are children playing in the streets who could solve some of my top problems in physics, because they have modes of sensory perception that I lost long ago.
It is perfectly obvious that the whole world is going to hell. The only possible chance that it might not is that we do not attempt to prevent it from doing so.
Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds. (quoting the Bhagavad-Gita after witnessing the first Nuclear explosion.)
[About the great synthesis of atomic physics in the 1920s:] It was a heroic time. It was not the doing of any one man; it involved the collaboration of scores of scientists from many different lands. But from the first to last the deeply creative, subtle and critical spirit of Niels Bohr guided, restrained, deepened and finally transmuted the enterprise.
'It worked.' (said after witnessing the first atomic detonation).
The search for knowledge is in our genes. It was put there by our distant ancestors who spread across the world, and it's never going to be quenched.
You have to know evolution to understand the natural world. And that cannot be a threat to people of faith. There's a serious problem if you are forced by your faith to reject the most well-supported theory in all of science.
Before the discovery of quantum mechanics, the framework of physics was this: If you tell me how things are now, I can then use the laws of physics to calculate, and hence predict, how things will be later.
Our only chance of long-term survival is not to remain lurking on planet Earth, but to spread out into space.
Many different planets are many different distances from their host star; we find ourselves at this distance because if we were closer or farther away, the temperature would be hotter or colder, eliminating liquid water, an essential ingredient for our survival.
My emotional investment is in finding truth. If string theory is wrong, I'd like to have known that yesterday. But if we can show it today or tomorrow, fantastic.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.