Religion has very little to do with the number of babies per woman. All the religions in the world are fully [able] to maintain their values and adapt to this new world.
Hans RoslingRead
Beyond 2050 the world population may start to decrease if women across the world will have, on average, less than 2 children. But that decrease will be slow.
Interpretation
The quote suggests that global population growth will slow down and potentially reverse if women's average childbirth rates fall below a certain threshold.
Hans Rosling highlights the demographic implications of declining birth rates among women worldwide. The statement implies that if women have fewer than two children on average, the global population may eventually decrease. However, he also points out that such a decline would be gradual, emphasizing the need to consider the long-term impacts of reproductive choices on global demographics.
In practice
During a seminar on sustainable development, one might reference this quote to discuss the future of global resources.
Religion has very little to do with the number of babies per woman. All the religions in the world are fully [able] to maintain their values and adapt to this new world.
Health cannot be bought at the supermarket. You have to invest in health. You have to get kids into schooling. You have to train health staff. You have to educate the population.
When I have an argument with someone, even with someone I am not very close with, I can't sleep at night thinking about it. It's terrible. But I still manage speak out frankly because I have also been gifted with the ability to read people. I can sense when they start to get irritated with me, and then, I shift.
You don't have to get rich to have [fewer] children. It has happened across the world.
I have a suggestion for a new name for the developing world. Let's call it the world.
If your economy grows [by] 4 percent, you ought to reduce child mortality 4 percent.
Whether conservative or liberal, fundamentalist or agnostic, the more students learn of biology, the more they accept evolution.
Forty years as an astronomer have not quelled my enthusiasm for lying outside after dark, staring up at the stars. It isn't only the beauty of the night sky that thrills me. It's the sense I have that some of those points of light are the home stars of beings not so different from us, daily cares and all, who look across space with wonder, just as we do.
Modern science has been a voyage into the unknown, with a lesson in humility waiting at every stop. Many passengers would rather have stayed home.
I assert that the cosmic religious experience is the strongest and the noblest driving force behind scientific research.
Information overload refers to the notion that we're trying to take in more than the brain can handle.
The energy requirements for interstellar travel are so great that it is inconceivable to me that any creatures piloting their ships across the vast depths of space would do so only in order to play games with us over a period of decades. If they want to make contact, they would make contact; if not, they would save their energy and go elsewhere.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.