QuoteProject
If they are too big to fail, make them smaller.
George P. Shultz
ShareWTF𝕏

Interpretation

What this quote means

The quote suggests that entities deemed 'too big to fail' should be reduced in size to prevent future crises.

George P. Shultz's quote addresses the concept of 'too big to fail' institutions, implying that when organizations reach such a size that their failure could lead to significant economic turmoil, it is prudent to take steps to diminish their size and, consequently, their impact on the economy. By advocating for making these entities smaller, the quote highlights the importance of creating a balance that prevents systemic risk, suggesting that size can lead to irresponsibility and fragility.

Themes

EconomyRiskSizeInstitutionsFailure

In practice

Example use cases

In a discussion about financial regulations, one might quote this to emphasize the need for limiting the growth of major institutions.

More from George P. Shultz

Nothing ever gets settled in this town. a seething debating society in which the debate never stops, in which people never give up, including me. And so that's the atmosphere in which you administer.
George P. ShultzRead
He who walks in the middle of the roads gets hit from both sides.
George P. ShultzRead
The minute you start talking about what you're going to do if you lose, you have lost.
George P. ShultzRead
What we want is scientists who don't become part of the policy discussion: All they do is produce science. If someone becomes an advocate, then I won't pay as much attention to their science.
George P. ShultzRead
I want my grandchildren to be proud of me. That's the main thing.
George P. ShultzRead
Increasingly, the state system has been eroding. Terrorists have exploited this weakness by burrowing into the state system in order to attack it.
George P. ShultzRead

Similar quotes

In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value.
Alan GreenspanRead
Government control of the economy, no matter in whose behalf, has been the source of all the evils in our industrial society -- and the solution is laissez-faire capitalism, i.e., the abolition of any and all forms of intervention in production and trade, the separation of State and Economics, in the same way and for the same reasons as the separation of Church and State.
Ayn RandRead
We need to keep in mind the well-established fact that the full effects of monetary policy are felt only after long lags. This means that policy makers cannot wait until they have achieved their objectives to begin adjusting policy.
Janet YellenRead
The introduction of a substantial Government transfer tax on all transactions might prove the most serviceable reform available,with a view to mitigating the predominance of speculation in the United States.
John Maynard KeynesRead
I attempted to see famines as broad "economic" problems (concentrating on how people can buy food, or otherwise get entitled to it), rather than in terms of the grossly undifferentiated picture of aggregate food supply for the economy as a whole.
Amartya SenRead
We cannot live without trade. A society can neither advance nor improve without excess of disposable income. This excess can only be amassed through the production of goods and services necessary or attractive to the mass. A financial system which allows this leads to inequality; one that does not leads to mass starvation.
David MametRead

A little wisdom, now and then

Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.