Kids deserve the right to think that they can change the world.
Lois LowryRead
Submitting to censorship is to enter the seductive world of 'The Giver': the world where there are no bad words and no bad deeds. But it is also the world where choice has been taken away and reality distorted. And that is the most dangerous world of all.
Interpretation
Censorship creates a false sense of safety by removing choices and distorting reality.
This quote by Lois Lowry highlights the dangers of censorship, suggesting that while it may seem appealing to avoid unpleasant words and actions, the true threat lies in losing the ability to choose and perceive reality clearly. By imposing restrictions on expression, society risks creating a sanitized version of the world that lacks authenticity and does not allow for growth, understanding, and the crucial engagement with the complexities of human experience.
In practice
In a discussion on artistic freedom, this quote can emphasize the importance of allowing diverse expressions.
Kids deserve the right to think that they can change the world.
Ellen had said that her mother was afraid of the ocean, that it was too cold and too big. The sky was, too, thought Annemarie. The whole world was: too cold, too big. And too cruel.
I always set out to tell a good story, to create a character that young people can relate to, place them in a situation that will be interesting, intriguing, eventually suspenseful. But what I find is that after I do that, then there are themes that emerge, which teachers can then use to provoke discussion and debate.
The man that I named the Giver passed along to the boy knowledge, history, memories, color, pain, laughter, love, and truth. Every time you place a book in the hands of a child, you do the same thing. It is very risky. But each time a child opens a book, he pushes open the gate that separates him from Elsewhere. It gives him choices. It gives him freedom. Those are magnificent, wonderfully unsafe things. [from her Newberry Award acceptance speech]
If somebody takes the time, a: to read a book that I have written, and then to b: care about it enough to write me and ask questions, surely I owe them a response.
I think when you've had success, publishers and reviewers and readers are willing to let you try something new if you've already proven yourself. They're excited about what you're doing, you have people interested in it, and actually waiting for it. It's empowering.
I believed that there was a God because I was told it by my grandmother and later by other adults. But when I found that I knew not only that there was God but that I was a child of God, when I understood that, when I comprehended that, more than that, when I internalized that, ingested that, I became courageous.
Soft-brained people, weak-minded, chicken-hearted , cannot find the truth. One has to be free, and as broad as the sky.
But which is the State's essential function, aggression or defence, few seem to know or care.
The history of philosophy is actually full of people who argue for rather wild and incredible views, and their reputations are based on the skill of arguing for them.
I can't imagine myself outside any kind of social or political involvement.
I refuse to accept the idea that the “isness” of man's present nature makes him morally incapable of reaching up for the eternal “oughtness” that forever confronts him.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.