There is a time for weighing evidence and a time for acting. And if there's one thing I've learned throughout my work in finance, government, and conservation, it is to act before problems become too big to manage.
Henry PaulsonRead
Complexity and interconnectedness matter as much as size in assessing risk in banking.
Interpretation
Understanding risk in banking requires looking at both complex factors and how they interconnect, not just the size of the institutions involved.
Henry Paulson's quote emphasizes that in the banking sector, the assessment of risk should not solely focus on the size of financial institutions. Instead, it advocates for a comprehensive evaluation that considers the complexities of financial systems and their interdependencies, as these factors can play a critical role in financial stability and risk management.
In practice
In a financial seminar discussing the importance of risk assessment in banking practices.
There is a time for weighing evidence and a time for acting. And if there's one thing I've learned throughout my work in finance, government, and conservation, it is to act before problems become too big to manage.
In all my life, I've been trained that when there's a big problem, you run toward it.
Every global concern - economic, environmental or security-related - can be addressed more effectively when the U.S. and China work together.
I think history shows that countries have to have some kind of a threshold level of economic success before they begin to have the means and the will to focus on the environment.
I've always said to everyone that ever worked for me, if you get too dug in on a position, the facts change, and you don't change to adapt to the facts, you will never be successful.
A single agency responsible for systemic risk would be accountable in a way that no regulator was in the run-up to the 2008 crisis. With access to all necessary information to monitor the markets, this regulator would have a better chance of identifying and limiting the impact of future speculative bubbles.
I'm not emotional about investments. Investing is something where you have to be purely rational and not let emotion affect your decision making - just the facts.
Banks are run by executives, and executives protect themselves, and that does not always mean that banks are going to behave rationally.
All the time and effort people devote to picking the right fund, the hot hand, the great manager have, in most cases, led to no advantage.
The basic story remains simple and never-ending. Stocks aren't lottery tickets. There's a company attached to every share.
Finance that only talks to itself & deals with each other becomes socially useless
There's so much disagreement about investing, and it's because nobody really knows.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.