There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
A consistent anarchist must oppose private ownership of the means of production, and the wage-slavery which is a component of this system, as incompatible with the principle that labor must be freely undertaken and under the control of the producer.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote highlights the conflict between private ownership in capitalism and the idea of freely chosen labor.
In this quote, Noam Chomsky argues that true anarchism entails rejecting private ownership of production because it leads to wage slavery, which contradicts the fundamental anarchist principle that labor should be voluntary and controlled by those who produce. Chomsky emphasizes that for anarchy to be realized, labor must not be coerced or exploited but rather freely undertaken by individuals who have autonomy over their work and its outcomes.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a lecture on economic systems, one could use this quote to illustrate the disparity between anarchist ideals and capitalist practices.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes βThe 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
For outward show is a wonderful perverter of the reason.
WE ARE DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY - I mean our country itself, our land. This is a terrible thing to know, but it is not a reason for despair unless we decide to continue the destruction. If we decide to continue the destruction, that will not be because we have no other choice. This destruction is not necessary. It is not inevitable, except that by our submissiveness we make it so.
Sex is the mysticism of materialism and the only possible religion in a materialistic society.
Losing love is so rich a philosophical ordeal that it makes a hairdresser into a rival of Socrates.
Privilege, you see, is one of the great adversaries of the imagination; it spreads a thick layer of adipose tissue over our sensitivity.
I think if something's emotionally real - and I'm not even talking about in movies or in art, but in life - you can't really argue with that, even if your intellectual mind might know differently.