For those whose exclusive norm of constitutional judging is merely fair reading of language applied to facts objectively viewed, 'Brown' must either be flat-out wrong or a very mystifying decision.
David SouterRead
The Constitution is a pantheon of values, and a lot of hard cases are hard because the Constitution gives no simple rule of decision for the cases in which one of the values is truly at odds with another.
Interpretation
The Constitution embodies complex values that can conflict, making legal decisions challenging.
David Souter’s quote reflects the intricate nature of the Constitution as a framework of values rather than a set of simplistic rules. It emphasizes that when values specified in the Constitution clash, there is often no straightforward solution, highlighting the difficulty faced by judges and lawmakers in interpreting and applying these values in real-world situations.
In practice
In a law class discussing the complexities of legal interpretation, this quote can illustrate the challenges judges face.
For those whose exclusive norm of constitutional judging is merely fair reading of language applied to facts objectively viewed, 'Brown' must either be flat-out wrong or a very mystifying decision.
The language of the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection of the laws did not change between 1896 and 1954, and it would be very hard to say that the obvious facts on which 'Plessy' was based had changed.
There is a danger to judicial independence when people have no understanding of how the judiciary fits into the constitutional scheme.
The Constitution is no simple contract, not because it uses a certain amount of open-ended language, but because its language grants and guarantees many good things, and good things that compete with each other and can never all be realized, altogether, all at once.
Life is a progress from want to want, not from enjoyment to enjoyment.
Can you worship a God who isn't obligated to explain His actions to you? Could it be your arrogance that makes you think God owes you an explanation?
Often when religious leaders come together, they talk about a particular sexual ethic, or an abstruse doctrine, as though this, rather than compassion, was the test of spiritual life.
On a planet that increasingly resembles one huge Maximum Security prison, the only intelligent choice is to plan a jail break.
Hours later the blank sheet still stared at me, and I beat my fist against the desk in fury and fustration, striking it so hard my hand bled. That is how heavy a secret can become. It can make blood flow easier than ink.
I'm just not convinced that Jesus is going to say, "When I was hungry, you gave a check to the United Way and they fed me.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.