I could not help but think that somewhere along the way we had missed what was radical about our faith and replaced it with what is comfortable.
Interpretation
The quote reflects on how people often lose the true, challenging essence of their beliefs in favor of more comfortable interpretations.
David Platt's quote critiques the tendency for believers to adopt comfortable versions of their faith rather than embracing its more radical and transformative aspects. This omission can lead to a diluted understanding of faith, where the challenges and fundamental teachings are overlooked for the sake of convenience and ease. It serves as a reminder to reflect deeply on the core tenets of one's beliefs and to recognize when comfort has replaced conviction.
In practice
During a sermon, the pastor referenced this quote to encourage the congregation to embrace the challenging aspects of their faith.
So what is the difference between someone who willfully indulges in sexual pleasures while ignoring the Bible on moral purity and someone who willfully indulges in the selfish pursuit of more and more material possessions while ignoring the Bible on caring for the poor? The difference is that one involves a social taboo in the church and the other involves the social norm in the church.
The price is certainly high for people who don’t know Christ and who live in a world where Christians shrink back from self-denying faith and settle into self-indulging faith. While Christians choose to spend their lives fulfilling the American dream instead of giving their lives to proclaiming the kingdom of God, literally billions in need of the Gospel remain in the dark
What if the very reason we have breath is because we have been saved for a global mission? And what if anything less than passionate involvement in global mission is actually selling God short by frustrating the very purpose for which he created us?
A high view of God’s sovereignty fuels death-defying devotion to global missions. Maybe another way to put it, people, and more specifically pastors, who believe that God’s sovereign over all things will lead Christians to die for the sake of all peoples.
[...]there is no injustice in God. The injustice lies in Christians who possess the gospel and refuse to give their lives to making it known among those who haven't heard.
God involves us in his missions not because He needs us, but because He loves us. And in His mercy He has invited us to be involved in His sovereign design for the spread of the gospel to the ends of the earth.
This deep agnosticism is more than the refusal of conventional agnosticism to take a stand on whether God exists or whether the mind survives bodily death. It is the willingness to embrace the fundamental bewilderment of a finite, fallible creature as the basis for leading a life that no longer clings to the superficial consolations of certainty.
The existence of nuclear weapons presents a clear and present danger to life on Earth. Nuclear arms cannot bolster the security of any nation because they represent a threat to the security of the human race. These incredibly destructive weapons are an affront to our common humanity, and the tens of billions of dollars that are dedicated to their development and maintenance should be used instead to alleviate human need and suffering
If we are not fully ourselves, truly in the present moment, we miss everything.
Justice renders to every one his due.
...When the government goes into the business of destroying trust, it goes into the business of destroying itself.
The revival in religion will be a rhetorical problem - new persuasive words for defaced or degraded ones.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.