When you lose your freedom, you lose, first and foremost, the opportunity to choose the company you keep.
Masha GessenRead
Dictators fall when they're overconfident; they stay in power when they're paranoid.
Interpretation
Dictators often lose their power due to their overconfidence; however, their paranoia can help them maintain control.
This quote highlights the paradoxical nature of dictatorial power. It suggests that dictators may become overconfident, underestimating opposition and the consequences of their actions, which can lead to their downfall. Conversely, when they are paranoid, they may take excessive measures to secure their power, making it harder for them to be challenged or removed.
In practice
A political speech discussing historical examples of dictators who overstepped their authority.
When you lose your freedom, you lose, first and foremost, the opportunity to choose the company you keep.
There's the hypothesis that things just keep happening to Russians, things that keep turning them into the same kind of subjects, as opposed to citizens. The more credible hypothesis, I think, is that there is a kind of trauma, a social trauma that is passed on from generation to generation.
We learn to think of history as something that has already happened, to other people. Our own moment, filled as it is with minutiae destined to be forgotten, always looks smaller in comparison.
Russia, at the start of the 21st century, at least in its larger cities, very much resembled the United States of the early 1990s: being gay was no longer criminal or shameful, but it was still not a topic for polite conversation or public discussion.
... fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there-because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie. The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don't think it should exist.
Any country is either becoming more democratic or less democratic. I think the United States hasn't tended to its journey toward democracy in a long time.
I am making a collection of the things my opponents have found me to be and, when this election is over, I am going to open a museum and put them on display.
To the people who are upset about their hard-earned tax money going to things they donβt like: welcome to the f*cking club. Reimburse me for the Iraq war and oil subsidies, and diaphragms are on me!
I opposed the Suez war, I opposed the Falklands war. I opposed the Libyan bombing and I opposed the Gulf war and I never believed that any of those principled arguments lost a single vote - indeed, I think they gained support though that was not why you did it. What has been lacking in Labour politics over a long period is a principled stand
The strongest democracies flourish from frequent and lively debate, but they endure when people of every background and belief find a way to set aside smaller differences in service of a greater purpose.
The foulest damage to our political life comes not from the 'secrets' which they hide from us, but from the little bits of half-truth and disinformation which they do tell us. These are already pre-digested, and then are sicked up as little gobbits of authorised spew. The columns of defense correspondents in the establishment sheets serve as the spittoons.
Let each citizen remember at the moment he is offering his vote...that he is executing one of the most solemn trusts in human society for which he is accountable to God and his country.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.