When you lose your freedom, you lose, first and foremost, the opportunity to choose the company you keep.
Masha GessenRead
Dictators fall when they're overconfident; they stay in power when they're paranoid.
Interpretation
Dictators often lose their power due to their overconfidence; however, their paranoia can help them maintain control.
This quote highlights the paradoxical nature of dictatorial power. It suggests that dictators may become overconfident, underestimating opposition and the consequences of their actions, which can lead to their downfall. Conversely, when they are paranoid, they may take excessive measures to secure their power, making it harder for them to be challenged or removed.
In practice
A political speech discussing historical examples of dictators who overstepped their authority.
When you lose your freedom, you lose, first and foremost, the opportunity to choose the company you keep.
There's the hypothesis that things just keep happening to Russians, things that keep turning them into the same kind of subjects, as opposed to citizens. The more credible hypothesis, I think, is that there is a kind of trauma, a social trauma that is passed on from generation to generation.
We learn to think of history as something that has already happened, to other people. Our own moment, filled as it is with minutiae destined to be forgotten, always looks smaller in comparison.
Russia, at the start of the 21st century, at least in its larger cities, very much resembled the United States of the early 1990s: being gay was no longer criminal or shameful, but it was still not a topic for polite conversation or public discussion.
... fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there-because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie. The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don't think it should exist.
Any country is either becoming more democratic or less democratic. I think the United States hasn't tended to its journey toward democracy in a long time.
Democracy is not a spectator sport. It is a difficult, hard, full-contact, participatory endeavor.
While democracy must have its organizations and controls, its vital breath is individual liberty.
...the first step in the revolution by the working class, is to raise the proletariat to the position of ruling class, to win the battle for democracy.
When the three branches of government have failed to represent the citizenry and the mass of the media has failed to represent the citizenry, then the citizenry better represent the citizenry.
Every provisional political set-up following a revolution requires a dictatorship, and an energetic dictatorship at that.
Our 'neoconservatives' are neither new nor conservative, but old as Bablyon and evil as Hell.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.