There are cases where the slave does not know his servitude and where it is necessary to bring the seed of his liberation to him from the outside: his submission is not enough to justify the tyranny which is imposed upon him.
Simone De BeauvoirRead
If we turn to the differences separating Communist, Fascist, and National Socialist regimes, we find that they can be accounted for by contrasting social, economic, and cultural condition in which the three had to operate. In other words, they resulted from tactical adaptation of the same philosophy of government to local circumstances, not from different philosophies.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Differences in totalitarian regimes arise from local conditions rather than distinct philosophies.
In this quote, Richard Pipes emphasizes that the varying forms of totalitarianism—Communism, Fascism, and National Socialism—are not fundamentally different in ideology. Instead, their distinctions stem from the specific social, economic, and cultural contexts in which they developed, demonstrating that similar governmental philosophies can lead to diverse manifestations based on local circumstances.
Themes
TotalitarianismPhilosophyGovernmentIdeologyContext
In practice
Example use cases
During a lecture on political theory, one could cite this quote to discuss how ideologies transform based on social conditions.
Similar quotes
Alcohol is barren. The words a man speaks in the night of drunkenness fade like the darkness itself at the coming of day.
Marguerite DurasRead
All silencing of discussion is an assumption of infallibility.
John Stuart MillRead
We have to be careful that in throwing out the devil, we don't throw out the best part of ourselves.
Friedrich NietzscheRead
We're poor little lambs who've lost our way, Baa! Baa! Baa! We're little black sheep who've gone astray, Baa-aa-aa! Gentlemen-rankers out on the spree, Damned from here to Eternity, God ha' mercy on such as we, Baa! Yah! Bah!
Rudyard KiplingRead
They said that I should lose my ideals and begin to believe in the methods of practical politicians. Now, I have not lost my ideals in the least; my faith in fundamentals is exactly what it always was. What I have lost is my childlike faith in practical politics.
Gilbert K. ChestertonRead