Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices.
Theodor AdornoRead
Estrangement shows itself precisely in the elimination of distance between people.
Interpretation
Estrangement occurs when people become emotionally disconnected despite physical closeness.
In this quote, Theodor Adorno suggests that true estrangement is not only about physical separation but rather the emotional and psychological distance that can exist even when individuals are close to one another. It highlights the paradox that being near someone does not necessarily mean being connected, and that the absence of genuine understanding or intimacy can lead to a sense of estrangement.
In practice
In a speech about relationship dynamics, one could use this quote to illustrate how physical proximity does not equate to emotional intimacy.
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices.
What can oppose the decline of the west is not a resurrected culture but the utopia that is silently contained in the image of its decline.
Wrong life cannot be lived rightly.
Auschwitz begins wherever someone looks at a slaughterhouse and thinks: theyβre only animals.
The splinter in your eye is the best magnifying-glass available.
The culture industry not so much adapts to the reactions of its customers as it counterfeits them.
One reason most people never stop thinking is that mental frenzy keeps us from having to see the upsetting aspects of our lives. If I'm constantly brooding about my children or career, I won't notice that I'm lonely. If I grapple continuously with logistical problems, I can avoid contemplating little issues like, say, my own mortality.
Those that think that wealth is the proper thing for them cannot give up their revenues; those that seek distinction cannot give up the thought of fame; those that cleave to power cannot give the handle of it to others. While they hold their grasp of those things, they are afraid of losing them. When they let them go, they are grieved and they will not look at a single example, from which they might perceive the folly of their restless pursuits - such men are under the doom of heaven.
Doing for people what they can and ought to do for themselves is a dangerous experiment. In the last analysis, the welfare of the workers depends upon their own initiative. Whatever is done under the guise of philanthropy or social morality which in any way lessens initiative is the greatest crime that can be committed against the toilers. Let social busybodies and professional "public morals experts" in their fads reflect upon the perils they rashly invite under this pretense of social welfare.
The will of the people, moreover, practically means the will of the most numerous or the most active part of the people; the majority, or those who succeed in making themselves accepted as the majority; type people, consequently, may desire to oppress a part of their number; and precautions are as much needed against this as against any other abuse of power.
Why is it always the innocents who suffer most, when you high lords play your game of thrones?
God is so big. It's a gigantic concept in God. The idea that God might love us and be interested in us is kind of huge and gigantic, but we turn it, because we're small-minded, into this tiny, petty, often greedy version of God, that is religion.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.