Passive fatalism can never be the role of a revolutionary party, like the Social Democracy.
The failure of the Russian Socialist Republic will be the defeat of the proletariat of the whole world.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote expresses the idea that the collapse of a socialist government in Russia would have global repercussions for working-class movements everywhere.
Karl Liebknecht's quote emphasizes the interconnectedness of socialist and proletarian movements across the globe. He suggests that the fate of the Russian Socialist Republic is crucial for the international proletariat, indicating that a failure in Russia would signify a broader defeat for working-class struggles around the world, thereby highlighting the importance of solidarity among oppressed peoples.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In an academic discussion about socialist movements, this quote can highlight the importance of global solidarity.
More from Karl Liebknecht
All quotes βTo the socialist no nation is free whose national existence is based upon the enslavement of another people, for to him colonial peoples, too, are peoples, and, as such, parts of the national state.
In the present imperialistic milieu there can be no wars of national self-defense.
Like a cyclone, imperialism spins across the globe; militarism crushes peoples and sucks their blood like a vampire.
Just as invasion is the true and tried weapon in the hands of capital against the class struggle, so on the other hand the fearless pursuit of the class struggle has always proven the most effective preventative of foreign invasions.
For capitalism, war and peace are business and nothing but business.
Similar quotes
There's not a liberal America and a conservative America - there's the United States of America.
To be free is better than to be unfree β always. Any politician who suggests the opposite should be treated as suspect.
Socialism in Russia has not brought about an improvement in the conditions of the average man which can be compared with the improvement of conditions, during the same period, in the United States.
Nominally left- and right-wing populists differ primarily in their choice of which 'others' to exclude and attack, with the former singling out big corporations and oligarchs, and the latter targeting ethnic or religious minorities.
It is always a disappointment to turn from forthright consideration of some subject - whether from the Left or the Right, a poet or a plumber - to the Beltway version, in which the only aspects of the issue that matter are the effects it will have on the fortunes of the two parties and the various men in power.
Political experience is political inefficacy.