Economists (and others) who are satisfied with nature-free equations develop a dangerous hubris about the potency of our species
Garrett HardinRead
A finite world can support only a finite population; therefore, population growth must eventually equal zero.
Interpretation
This quote emphasizes the limits of our planet in supporting human life and the necessity for population stabilization.
Garrett Hardin's quote highlights the fundamental relationship between the earth's resources and human population growth. It suggests that because the planet has finite resources, unchecked population growth is unsustainable and must ultimately halt to maintain ecological balance. This call for a zero-growth strategy reflects a critical perspective on environmental sustainability and the limitations of natural resources.
In practice
In a speech addressing climate change, one might use this quote to highlight the importance of population control.
Economists (and others) who are satisfied with nature-free equations develop a dangerous hubris about the potency of our species
Moreover, the practical recommendations deduced from ecological principles threaten the vested interests of commerce; it is hardly surprising that the financial and political power created by these investments should be used sometimes to suppress environmental impact studies.
A technical solution may be defined as one that requires a change only in the techniques of the natural sciences, demanding little or nothing in the way of change in human values or ideas of morality.
Thou shalt not transgress the carrying capacity
Indeed, our particular concept of private property, which deters us from exhausting the positive resources of the earth, favors pollution.
Society does not need more children; but it does need more loved children. Quite literally, we cannot afford unloved children - but we pay heavily for them every day. There should not be the slightest communal concern when a woman elects to destroy the life of her thousandth-of-an-ounce embryo. But all society should rise up in alarm when it hears that a baby that is not wanted is about to be born.
The troubles of our proud and angry dust are from eternity, and shall not fail. Bear them we can, and if we can we must. Shoulder the sky, my lad, and drink your ale.
I see Edward Snowden as someone who has chosen, at best, exile from the country he loves-with a serious risk of his assassination by agents of his government or life in prison (in solitary confinement)-to awaken us to the danger of our loss of democracy to a total-surveilla nce state
Every thought is an afterthought.
I recently discussed with an intelligent and well-disposed man the threat of another war, which in my opinion would seriously endanger the existence of mankind, and I remarked that only a supranational organization would offer protection from that danger. Thereupon my visitor, very calmly and coolly, said to me: "Why are you so deeply opposed to the disappearance of the human race?".
I am hopeful, though not full of hope, and the only reason I don't believe in happy endings is because I don't believe in endings.
I want to be able to still surprise myself, even shock myself, whether it be sexual content, whether it be about the theological content, whatever. I want to be able to knock myself sideways. Otherwise, what a waste of a life that would be.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.