When we were told that by freedom we understood free enterprise, we did very little to dispel this monstrous falsehood. Wealth and economic well-being, we have asserted, are the fruits of freedom, while we should have been the first to know that this kind of happiness has been an unmixed blessing only in this country, and it is a minor blessing compared with the truly political freedoms, such as freedom of speech and thought, of assembly and association, even under the best conditions.
Interpretation
The quote critiques the misconception that economic wealth equates to true freedom, emphasizing the importance of political freedoms.
Hannah Arendt's quote challenges the common belief that free enterprise and economic success represent the essence of freedom. Instead, she argues that genuine freedom lies in political rights like freedom of speech and assembly, which are crucial for the well-being of society. Arendt suggests that while economic prosperity can bring happiness, it pales in comparison to the fundamental political freedoms that support true democracy and individual autonomy.
In practice
During a discussion on economic policies, this quote can highlight the importance of not equating wealth with freedom.
A life spent entirely in public, in the presence of others, becomes, as we would say, shallow. While it retains its visibility, it loses its quality of rising into sight from some darker ground which must remain hidden if it is not to lose its depth in a very real, non-subjective sense.
Politically speaking, tribal nationalism [patriotism] always insists that its own people are surrounded by 'a world of enemies' - 'one against all' - and that a fundamental difference exists between this people and all others. It claims its people to be unique, individual, incompatible with all others, and denies theoretically the very possibility of a common mankind long before it is used to destroy the humanity of man.
We are wont to see friendship solely as a phenomenon of intimacy in which the friends open their hearts to each other unmolested by the world and its demands...Thus it is hard for us to understand the political relevance of friendship...But for the Greeks the essence of friendship consisted in discourse...The converse (in contrast to the intimate talk in which individuals speak about themselves), permeated though it may be by pleasure in the friend’s presence, is concerned with the common world.
Our tradition of political thought had its definite beginning in the teachings of Plato and Aristotle. I believe it came to a no less definite end in the theories of Karl Marx.
Even though we have lost yardsticks by which to measure, and rules under which to subsume the particular, a being whose essence is a beginning may have enough of origin within himself to understand without preconceived categories and to judge without the set of customary rules which is morality.
It is the nature of beginning that something new is started which cannot be expected from whatever may have happened before. This character of startling unexpectedness is inherent in all beginnings.
If people knew the story of their lives, how many would then elect to live them?
The woman's soul is fashioned as a shelter in which other souls may unfold.
The goal of life is not to have our lives mean something to ourselves. The goal of life is to have our lives mean something to others.
So lonely 'twas that God himself Scarce seemed there to be.
Faith, like a jackal, feeds among the tombs, and even from these dead doubts she gathers her most vital hope.
One may well find oneself beginning to doubt whether all this could conceivably be the product of an enormous lottery presided over by natural selection, blindly picking the rare winners from among numbers drawn at utter random...nevertheless although the miracle of life stands "explained" it does not strike us as any less miraculous. As Francois Mauriac wrote, What this professor says is far more incredible than what we poor Christians believe.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.