Compassion is the key in Islam and Buddhism and Judaism and Christianity. They are profoundly similar.
Karen ArmstrongRead
Fundamentalists are not friends of democracy. And that includes your fundamentalists in the United States.
Interpretation
Fundamentalists oppose democratic values and processes, including those in the U.S.
This quote by Karen Armstrong highlights the inherent conflict between fundamentalist ideologies and democratic principles. Fundamentalists tend to uphold rigid beliefs that may undermine the pluralism and open dialogue essential for a healthy democracy, suggesting that their presence in any society, including the United States, poses a challenge to democratic values and governance.
In practice
During a political discussion about the challenges faced by democracy, one might reference this quote to emphasize the risks posed by extremist beliefs.
Compassion is the key in Islam and Buddhism and Judaism and Christianity. They are profoundly similar.
Yet a personal God can become a grave liability. He can be a mere idol carved in our own image, a projection of our limited needs, fears and desires. We can assume that he loves what we love and hates what we hate, endorsing our prejudices instead of compelling us to transcend them.
When violence becomes imbedded in a region, then this affects everything. It affects your dreams, your fantasies and relationships, and your religion becomes violent, too.
Far from being the father of jihad, [Prophet] Mohammad was a peacemaker, who risked his life and nearly lost the loyalty of his closest companions because he was determined to effect a reconciliation with Mecca
Yes, all fundamentalists feel that in a secular society, God has been relegated to the margin, to the periphery and they are all in different ways seeking to drag him out of that peripheral position, back to center stage.
Religion is a search for transcendence. But transcendence isn't necessarily sited in an external god, which can be a very unspiritual, unreligious concept.
I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power, than by violent and sudden usurpations; but, on a candid examination of history, we shall find that turbulence, violence, and abuse of power, by the majority trampling on the rights of the minority, have produced factions and commotions, which, in republics, have, more frequently than any other cause, produced despotism.
When government programs fail, it is often because public officials are clueless about how human beings think and act.
Occupying armies have responsibilities, not rights. Their primary responsibility is to withdraw as quickly and expeditiously as possible, in a manner determined by the occupied population.
It is an unquestionable truth, that the body of the people in every country desire sincerely its prosperity. But it is equally unquestionable that they do not possess the discernment and stability necessary for systematic government. To deny that they are frequently led into the grossest of errors, by misinformation and passion, would be a flattery which their own good sense must despise.
It would seem that the Watergate story from beginning to end could be used as a primer on the American political system.
I wanted us to go to the Tories when we were strong...not in misfortune to be made an honest woman of.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.