Knowing what your parents have gives you hints of things, but your genome is a totally unique combination of and interchange of DNA from your parents. There is no one else like you genetically.
Genome design is going to be a key part of the future. That's why we need fast, cheap, accurate DNA synthesis, so you can make a lot of iterations of something and test them.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The future of innovation in genetics relies on affordable and precise DNA synthesis to enable extensive experimentation.
In this quote, Craig Venter emphasizes the critical role of genome design in shaping the future of scientific advancements. He stresses the importance of having fast, cheap, and accurate DNA synthesis capabilities, which will allow scientists to create numerous variations of genetic sequences and test their functionalities efficiently. This iterative process is essential for breakthroughs in areas like medicine, agriculture, and biotechnology, ultimately pushing the boundaries of what we can achieve through genetic engineering.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a presentation about the future of biotechnology, one might use this quote to underline the role of genome design.
More from Craig Venter
All quotes →We're moving from reading the genetic code to writing it.
A doctor can save maybe a few hundred lives in a lifetime. A researcher can save the whole world.
The Anthropocentic Age - the first age in which humankind is the dominant species on the planet - cuts both ways: it is up to us to destroy or save the planet. We certainly have the ability.
Genomics are about individuals. It's about what's specific to you, not your siblings, not your parents - each of us is totally unique. We will only see that uniqueness by drilling down to the genetic code.
Now that we can read and write the genetic code, put it in digital form and translate it back into synthesized life, it will be possible to speed up biological evolution to the pace of social evolution.
Similar quotes
The sheer quantity of brain power that hurled itself voluntarily and quixotically into the search for new baseball knowledge was either exhilarating or depressing, depending on how you felt about baseball. The same intellectual resources might have cured the common cold, or put a man on Pluto.
I believe that science is the engine of prosperity, that if you look around at the wealth of civilization today, it's the wealth that comes from science.
Mathematics brought rigor to Economics. Unfortunately, it also brought mortis.
We put water down into the earth to push up gas, then we say, 'Ooh, we're having a water crisis.' This is foolishness, and this kind of foolishness, where we try to excuse human behavior, is dangerous.
There's no tradition of scientists knocking down the Sunday school door, telling the preacher, That might not necessarily be true. That's never happened. There're no scientists picketing outside of churches.
The scientist finds his reward in what Henri Poincare calls the joy of comprehension, and not in the possibility of application to which any discovery may lead.