There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Chomsky critiques the flaws of government systems compared to the unregulated power of corporations.
In this quote, Noam Chomsky highlights the inherent flaws within democratic governments, suggesting that they have the potential for representation and accountability, yet often fail to fulfill these ideals. In contrast, he argues that corporations operate without such democratic accountability, functioning purely as tyrannies that prioritize profit over the welfare of individuals or society, emphasizing the need for critical examination of both systems.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a lecture on corporate ethics, one might quote Chomsky to underscore the dangers of unchecked corporate power.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes βThe 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
The corporations are powerful only because we have allowed them to be. In theory, it is we, not they, who mandate the state. But we have neglected our duty of citizenship, and they have taken advantage of our neglect to seize the reins of government.
What political leaders decide, intelligence services tend to seek to justify.
Actually, to be an effective person politically in this country, I think you have to be thirty or over, and also you have to be rich, well-placed, you have to be close to power. And I don't think that young people, because they look young, can do much, as I think they are counterproductive.
In politics, what begins in fear usually ends in folly.
I don't think we can have democracies that work where most of the people are not benefiting economically, where most of the people are worried about their job security.
Extremism can flourish only in an environment where basic governmental social responsibility for the welfare of the people is neglected. Political dictatorship and social hopelessness create the desperation that fuels religious extremism.