There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
If you destroyed half the pharmaceutical production in the United States, we'd think it's a pretty serious problem. In fact, we'd probably go to war.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote emphasizes the value placed on pharmaceutical production and highlights the disparity in reactions to different types of crises.
Noam Chomsky's quote critiques societal and governmental responses to crises, suggesting that the destruction of pharmaceutical production would be treated as a significant threat requiring military action. This reflects on the prioritization of health and well-being in policy and the disproportionate reactions we have towards different forms of crisis, raising questions about how we value life and health compared to other issues.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
This quote can be used in a speech about the importance of healthcare and pharmaceutical advancements.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes βThe 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
So it is that real, personal sacrifice never was placing an animal on the altar. Instead, it is a willingness to put the animal in us upon the altar and letting it be consumed! Such is the 'sacrifice unto the Lord... of a broken heart and a contrite spirit,' (D&C 59:8), a prerequisite to taking up the cross, while giving 'away all [our] sins' in order to 'know God' (Alma 22:18) for the denial of self precedes the full acceptance of Him.
To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity.
You see, in this world there is one awful thing, and that is that everyone has his reasons.
If by the liberty of the press were understood merely the liberty of discussing the propriety of public measures and political opinions, let us have as much of it as you please: But if it means the liberty of affronting, calumniating and defaming one another, I, for my part, own myself willing to part with my share of it, whenever our legislators shall please so to alter the law and shall chearfully consent to exchange my liberty of abusing others for the privilege of not being abused myself.
Everyone - pantheist, atheist, skeptic, polytheist - has to answer these questions: 'Where did I come from? What is life's meaning? How do I define right from wrong and what happens to me when I die?' Those are the fulcrum points of our existence.
A 'no' does not hide anything, but a 'yes' very easily becomes a deception.