At the heart of quantum mechanics is a rule that sometimes governs politicians or CEOs-as long as no one is watching, anything goes.
Interpretation
The quote suggests that the behavior of people in power can be unpredictable and unprincipled when they believe they are not being observed.
Lawrence M. Krauss highlights a parallel between the principles of quantum mechanics and the behavior of authority figures like politicians and CEOs. Just as quantum mechanics allows for particles to exist in multiple states until observed, individuals in power may exhibit questionable actions behind closed doors, revealing a tendency towards unaccountability when they think there is no oversight. This observation raises ethical concerns about leadership and integrity.
In practice
In a speech about corporate ethics, one might say: 'As Lawrence M. Krauss pointedly illustrates, in leadership, integrity is paramount - especially when no one is watching.'
The one experience that I hope every student has at some point in their lives is to have some belief you profoundly, deeply hold, proved to be wrong because that is the most eye-opening experience you can have, and as a scientist, to me, is the most exciting experience I can ever have.
If our species is to survive, our future will probably require outposts beyond our own planet.
The ultimate arbiter of truth is experiment, not the comfort one derives from one's a priori beliefs, nor the beauty or elegance one ascribes to one's theoretical models.
I cannot stress often enough that what science is all about is not proving things to be true but proving them to be false.
To the extent that we even understand string theory, it may imply a massive number of possible different universes with different laws of physics in each universe, and there may be no way of distinguishing between them or saying why the laws of physics are the way they are. And if I can predict anything, then I haven't explained anything.
The illusion of purpose and design is perhaps the most pervasive illusion about nature that science has to confront on a daily basis.
Everything was so new - the whole idea of going into space was new and daring. There were no textbooks, so we had to write them.
What we want is scientists who don't become part of the policy discussion: All they do is produce science. If someone becomes an advocate, then I won't pay as much attention to their science.
When I began in 1960, individuality wasn't an accepted thing to look for; it was about species-specific behaviour. But animal behaviour is not hard science. There's room for intuition.
It's not going to be just humans colonizing space, it's going to be life moving out from the Earth, moving it into its kingdom. And the kingdom of life, of course, is going to be the universe.
The image of the scientist who puts the pursuit of truth before anything else has been shattered and replaced by a man on the make or a quasi-religious enthusiast who wants to prove his case at any cost. Science is becoming the tool of campaigning warfare, in which truth is the first casualty.
Science is bound, by the everlasting vow of honour, to face fearlessly every problem which can be fairly presented to it.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.