Humans treat animals as things that exist as means to human ends. That's morally wrong. Sexism promotes the idea that women are things that exist as means to the ends of men. That's morally wrong. We need to stop treating all persons - whether human or nonhuman - as things.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the ethical implications of viewing beings, whether human or animal, as objects for use rather than as individuals with their own rights.
Gary L. Francione emphasizes the moral issue of treating living beings merely as tools for human benefit, drawing parallels between the exploitation of animals and sexism. By asserting that both practices are morally wrong, he advocates for recognizing the inherent value of all beings and urges society to stop dehumanizing and objectifying individuals, regardless of species or gender.
In practice
During a lecture on ethics, one could use this quote to discuss the importance of recognizing the rights of all sentient beings.
The idea that we have the right to inflict suffering and death on other sentient beings for the trivial reasons of palate pleasure and fashion is, without doubt, one of the most arrogant and morally repugnant notions in the history of human thought.
They are nonhuman persons. They are not food. If animals matter morally at all, there is one and only one rational response: go vegan. Everything else is just participation in animal exploitation.
We cannot talk simultaneously about animal rights and the 'humane' slaughter of animals.
We are vegans not simply because being vegan will reduce suffering. We are vegan because every sentient being values her or his life even if no one else does. We are vegan because justice minimally requires that we not take life for trivial purposes.
We can no more justify using nonhumans as human resources than we can justify human slavery. Animal use and slavery have at least one important point in common: both institutions treat sentient beings exclusively as resources of others. That cannot be justified with respect to humans; it cannot be justified with respect to nonhumans—however “humanely” we treat them.
Veganism is the application of the principle of abolition in your own life; it represents your recognition that animals are not things. Veganism is the recognition of the moral personhood of nonhuman animals.
There is a wolf in me... - I keep this wolf because the wilderness gave it to me and the wilderness will not let it go.
Yeah, it's unfair that you can get judged by something you didn't do, but it's also unfair that you can inherit money that you didn't work for.
It was not the volume of sin that sent Christ to the cross; it was the fact of sin.
Monks, when ignorance is abandoned, and knowledge arises in the monk, with the ending of ignorance and the arising of knowledge he clings neither to sense-pleasures, nor does he cling to views, nor to precepts and vows, nor to a Self-doctrine. Not clinking, he is not disturbed; not disturbed, he attains individually nibbana.
A Warrior knows that the ends do not justify the means. Because there are no ends, there are only means.
Maybe you feel pressure to be positive because so many people rely on your good, fake-positive energy? If that's the case, screw everybody else. You're not a bottle of Valium.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.