Bullshit is unavoidable whenever circumstance require someone to talk without knowing what he is talking about.
Harry FrankfurtRead
It is impossible for someone to lie unless he thinks he knows the truth. Producing bullshit requires no such conviction.
Interpretation
Lying requires knowledge of the truth, whereas creating falsehoods does not.
In this quote, Harry Frankfurt explores the distinction between lying and producing unsubstantiated claims, or what he refers to as 'bullshit.' He suggests that a liar must have an understanding of the truth in order to intentionally deceive, while someone who engages in disingenuous or unfounded statements lacks such knowledge or commitment to the truth.
In practice
This quote can be shared in a philosophy class discussion about ethics and truth.
Bullshit is unavoidable whenever circumstance require someone to talk without knowing what he is talking about.
Recognizing truth requires selflessness. You have to leave yourself out of it so you can find out the way things are in themselves, not the way they look to you or how you feel about them or how you would like them to be.
One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit.
The fact about himself that the liar hides is that he is attempting to lead us away from a correct apprehension of reality; we are not to know that he wants us to believe something he supposes to be false. The fact about himself that the bullshitter hides, on the other hand, is that the truth-values of his statements are of no central interest to him . . . He does not care whether the things he says describe reality correctly. He just picks them out, or makes them up, to suit his purpose.
For while this year it may be a Catholic against whom the finger of suspicion is pointed, in other years it has been, and may someday be again, a Jewβ or a Quaker or a Unitarian or a Baptist. It was Virginia's harassment of Baptist preachers, for example, that helped lead to Jefferson's statute of religious freedom. Today I may be the victim, but tomorrow it may be you β until the whole fabric of our harmonious society is ripped at a time of great national peril.
I don't think exactly like a professional economist. I think about economics and economic ideas, but somewhat like an outsider.
The question that he frames in all but words is what to make of a diminished thing.
The roots of all living things are tied together. Deep in the ground of being, they tangle and embrace. This understanding is expressed in the term nonduality. If we look deeply, we find that we do not have a separate self-identity, a self that does not include sun and wind, earth and water, creatures and plants, and one another.
There is no freedom that I would grant to any man that I would refuse to woman, and there is no freedom that I would refuse to either man or woman except the freedom to invade ... whoever has the ballot has the freedom to invade, and whoever wants the ballot wants the freedom to invade. Give woman equality with man, by all means; but do it by taking power from man, not giving it to woman.
Iβm not clear enough in the head to feel anything but varieties of dull anger and arrows of sadness.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.