Look around, and you see everywhere the exertions and acts of individuals restricted, regulated, or promoted, on the principle of the common welfare.
An individual, in promoting his own interest, may injure the public interest; a nation, in promoting the general welfare, may check the interest of a part of its members.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote highlights the conflict between individual interests and the collective good, suggesting that actions for personal gain can harm society, while national actions for overall welfare may hinder specific individuals.
Friedrich List's quote explores the tension between personal ambitions and societal needs. It emphasizes that individuals often pursue their own interests, which can sometimes be detrimental to the larger community. Conversely, a nation's efforts to promote the greater good may inadvertently suppress the interests of certain individuals or groups within it. This reflects the complex dynamics of balancing personal rights and social responsibilities.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about the role of government in economic policies.
More from Friedrich List
All quotes →It is bad policy to regulate everything... where things may better regulate themselves and can be better promoted by private exertions; but it is no less bad policy to let those things alone which can only be promoted by interfering social power.
Industry entirely left to itself, would soon fall to ruin, and a nation letting everything alone would commit suicide.
Similar quotes
A man's liberties are none the less aggressed upon because those who coerce him do so in the belief that he will be benefited.
It was for one minute that I saw him, but the hair stood upon my head like quills. Sir, if that was my master, why had he a mask upon his face?
Given a choice between a folly and a sacrament, one should always choose the folly—because we know a sacrament will not bring us closer to god and there’s always the chance that a folly will.
People are always trying to be on top. And not always with a macabre agenda, but I think that people are desperately trying to remain in control, rather than being honest.
Man can sin against nature in two ways. First, when he sins against his specific rational nature, acting contrary to reason. In this sense, we can say that every sin is a sin against man's nature, because it is against man's right reason.
Because not even the least Dharma is there found or got at. Therefore is it called 'utmost, right and perfect enlightenment'. Self-identical is that Dharma and nothing is therein at variance. Therefore is it called 'utmost, right and perfect enlighten'