When you've spent half your political life dealing with humdrum issues like the environment, it's exciting to have a real crisis on your hands.
International order is not an evolution; it is an imposition. It is the domination of one vision over others- in this case, the domination of liberal free market principles of economics, democratic principles of politics, and a peaceful international system over other visions that other nations and peoples may have. It will last only as long as those who favor it retain the capacity to defend it.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote reflects on the imposition of a dominant international order shaped by liberal values over alternative visions from other nations.
Robert Kagan's quote articulates the idea that the current international order is not a natural progression but rather an imposed system that prioritizes liberal free market and democratic ideals. This dominance signifies a struggle between differing perspectives on governance and economics, suggesting that this order will endure only as long as its proponents are able to uphold it against challenges from competing viewpoints.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a debate about global trade policies, this quote can emphasize the need to understand the impositions of certain economic principles.
Similar quotes
The corporations are powerful only because we have allowed them to be. In theory, it is we, not they, who mandate the state. But we have neglected our duty of citizenship, and they have taken advantage of our neglect to seize the reins of government.
The strongest democracies flourish from frequent and lively debate, but they endure when people of every background and belief find a way to set aside smaller differences in service of a greater purpose.
The soviet people want full-blooded and unconditional democracy.
All political lives, unless they are cut off in midstream at a happy juncture, end in failure, because that is the nature of politics and of human affairs.
Lifting the veil of secrecy that shrouds police misconduct allegations would seem like an obvious democratic value. After all, if police work for the people, should they not be answerable to the people, as well? This is a basic tenet of good government.