There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
As international support for Obama's decision to attack Syria has collapsed, along with the credibility of government claims, the administration has fallen back on a standard pretext for war crimes when all else fails: the credibility of the threats of the self-designated policeman of the world.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote criticizes the use of war justifications that rely on international credibility, highlighting the failure of government claims.
Noam Chomsky emphasizes the decline of international support for military action, specifically referencing the credibility issues surrounding the U.S. government's justifications for attacking Syria. He suggests that when all reasonable arguments collapse, the government resorts to glorifying its role as a global authority, which he argues is a flawed rationale for warfare and a tactic commonly employed in justifying aggressive actions.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a debate on foreign policy, one might use this quote to illustrate the risks of military intervention.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes →The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
Unity and secularism will be the motto of the government. We can't afford divisive polity in India.
The government is us; we are the government, you and I.
We Filipinos have to exercise the necessary pressure on Marcos. But it would certainly help our cause if the Americans would stop supporting Mr. Marcos.
The world must be made safe for democracy.
There is no hope even that woman, with her right to vote, will ever purify politics.
I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.