My best teachers were not the ones who knew all the answers, but those who were deeply excited by questions they couldn't answer.
Brian GreeneRead
I’ve spent something like 17 years working on a theory for which there is essentially no direct experimental support.
Interpretation
This quote reflects the challenges of theoretical research in science, emphasizing the struggle for evidence.
Brian Greene highlights the difficulty faced by scientists who dedicate years to developing theories that may not have immediate or observable experimental validation. This underscores the nature of scientific inquiry, which often involves exploring ideas that are yet to be confirmed or understood through practical experiments.
In practice
In a research presentation about the importance of pursuing theoretical frameworks in science despite a lack of evidence.
My best teachers were not the ones who knew all the answers, but those who were deeply excited by questions they couldn't answer.
All mathematics is is a language that is well tuned, finely honed, to describe patterns; be it patterns in a star, which has five points that are regularly arranged, be it patterns in numbers like 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 that follow very regular progression.
According to inflation, the more than 100 billion galaxies, sparkling throughout space like heavenly diamonds, are nothing but quantum mechanics writ large across the sky. To me, this realization is one of the greatest wonders of the modern scientific age.
So: if you buy the notion that reality consists of the things in your freeze-frame mental image right now, and if you agree that your now is no more valid than the now of someone located far away in space who can move freely, then reality encompasses all of the events in spacetime.
Black holes, we all know, are these regions where if an object falls in, it can't get out, but the puzzle that many struggled with over the decades is, what happens to the information that an object contains when it falls into a black hole. Is it simply lost?
Physicists are more like avant-garde composers, willing to bend traditional rules... Mathematicians are more like classical composers.
But because we live in an age of science, we have a preoccupation with corroborating our myths.
The growth of our understanding of the world through science weakens some of the motivation which makes people believers. But that's not the same thing as saying they're incompatible. It's just that I think some of the traditional reasons for belief, going back thousands of years, are rather undermined.
Nothing in the natural world makes sense - except when seen in the light of evolution
As a theoretician, I am proud to be part of a counter revolution... discovering that quantum field theory language was not dead and finished but had not really been explored thoroughly enough.
The scientific evidence is now overwhelming: climate change presents very serious global risks, and it demands an urgent global response.
I took biology in high school and didn't like it at all. It was focused on memorization. ... I didn't appreciate that biology also had principles and logic ... [rather than dealing with a] messy thing called life. It just wasn't organized, and I wanted to stick with the nice pristine sciences of chemistry and physics, where everything made sense. I wish I had learned sooner that biology could be fun as well.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.