Perhaps if all the peoples of the world understand what war really means, we would eliminate it.
In journalism, we recognize a kind of hierarchy of fame among the famous. We measure it in two ways: by the length of an obituary and by how far in advance it is prepared. Presidents, former presidents, and certain heads of state are at the top of the chain.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote reflects on how society values fame and the metrics used to measure it, particularly in journalism.
Walter Cronkite's quote explores the idea that fame is not just about recognition but comes with a hierarchy that is particularly evident in journalism. The length of an obituary and the timing of its preparation serve as indicators of a person's societal importance, with political figures and heads of state often occupying the highest rungs of this fame ladder. This statement critiques the often superficial ways fame is assessed and highlights a certain moral and ethical responsibility in how we remember and honor influential figures.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a seminar on media ethics, I quoted Cronkite to illustrate how journalism shapes public perception of fame.
More from Walter Cronkite
All quotes βThe death of Churchill at 90 was one of those watershed moments in which the obituary rises to a special calling beyond the sharing of remembered times. It gave an older generation a rare opportunity to explain something of itself to its children.
I suppose popularity is measured by ratings. If a broadcaster is known as the leader because of ratings, then that's where people most want to be seen and heard, so there's no question that there's an advantage.
Objective journalism and an opinion column are about as similar as the Bible and Playboy magazine.
I feel no compulsion to be a pundit. As a matter of fact, I really don't have that much to say about most things. Working with hard news satisfies me completely.
I think that our comfort is in our history.
Similar quotes
Poverty in itself does not make men into a rabble; a rabble is created only when there is joined to poverty a disposition of mind, an inner indignation against the rich, against society, against the government.
If there were no God, he would have to be invented.
Plato used the dialogue format because the exchange of views, the posing and answering of questions, showed that understanding is a living, dynamic process. He distrusted writing because the settled character of the written word makes it look as if truth can be fixed and made to stand still. It is worth remembering that this greatest advocate of the objective reality of truth also believed that our access to that truth was sustained in reasoned discussion.
How do you deal with a criminal that will not listen to what you have to say and who continues his policy of violence? Some say you continue to talk and let him tire himself out. But nearly 40 years after the institution of apartheid, is there anyone who still believes that verbal persuasion will work?
The twin conceptions of sin and vindictive punishment seem to be at the root of much that is most vigorous, both in religion and politics.
We have to state, without mincing words, that there is an inseparable bond between our faith and the poor. May we never abandon them.