It would be great to have every engineer have at least some amount of knowledge of machine learning.
Jeff DeanRead
Supervised learning works so well when you have the right data set, but ultimately unsupervised learning is going to be a really important component in building really intelligent systems - if you look at how humans learn, it's almost entirely unsupervised.
Interpretation
This quote emphasizes the importance of both supervised and unsupervised learning in artificial intelligence, likening machine learning to human learning.
Jeff Dean highlights the dual importance of supervised and unsupervised learning in the development of intelligent systems. While supervised learning relies on labeled data, unsupervised learning reflects the way humans often learn from unstructured information, suggesting that for machines to achieve true intelligence, they must adopt unsupervised techniques akin to human cognitive processes.
In practice
During a technology conference, a speaker could use this quote to illustrate the future of AI development.
It would be great to have every engineer have at least some amount of knowledge of machine learning.
We want to build systems that can generalize to a new task. Being able to do things with much less data and with much less computation is going to be interesting and important.
Previously, we might use machine learning in a few sub-components of a system. Now we actually use machine learning to replace entire sets of systems, rather than trying to make a better machine learning model for each of the pieces.
Some people are happy to work in a particular domain or some field of computer science for years, and years. I personally like to kind of move around every few years, just to learn about new areas.
I like working in small teams where people on the team have very different skills than what I have and that banter back and forth, and the ability to build something collectively that none of you could do individually is actually a really useful and valuable thing.
It may be said that natural selection is daily and hourly scrutinizing, throughout the world, every variation, even the slightest; rejecting that which is bad, preserving and adding up all that is good; silently and insensibly working, wherever and whenever opportunity offers, at the improvement of each organic being in relation to its organic and inorganic conditions of life.
Most people say that it is the intellect which makes a great scientist. They are wrong: it is character.
I lose sleep at night wondering whether we are intelligent enough to figure out the universe. I don't know.
On seeing the marsupials in Australia for the first time and comparing them to placental mammals: βAn unbeliever . . . might exclaim 'Surely two distinct Creators must have been at work'β
Although this may seem a paradox, all exact science is dominated by the idea of approximation. When a man tells you that he knows the exact truth about anything, you are safe in inferring that he is an inexact man. Every careful measurement in science is always given with the probable error ... every observer admits that he is likely wrong, and knows about how much wrong he is likely to be.
I would say the biggest handicap we have right now is some nutcases in our country that don't believe in global warming. I think they are going to change their position because of pressure from individuals, because the evidence of the ravages of global warming is already there.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.