I am an ordinary person who has been blessed with extraordinary opportunities and experiences.
Sonia SotomayorRead
All of the legal defense funds out there, they're looking for people out there with court of appeals experience, because court of appeals is where policy is made. And I know, I know this is on tape and I should never say that because we don't make law, I know. I know.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the importance of court of appeals experience in shaping legal policy.
In this quote, Sonia Sotomayor emphasizes the role of court of appeals judges in influencing and creating legal policy, suggesting that their decisions carry significant weight in the legal landscape. Although she acknowledges the distinction between making law and interpreting it, she points out that the court of appeals is a critical arena where important legal precedents are established.
In practice
This quote could be used during a legal seminar to illustrate the impact of court rulings on policy.
I am an ordinary person who has been blessed with extraordinary opportunities and experiences.
This wealth of experiences, personal and professional, have helped me appreciate the variety of perspectives that present themselves in every case that I hear.
I was fifteen years old when I understood how it is that things break down: people can't imagine someone else's point of view.
The truth is that since childhood I had cultivated an existential independence. It came from perceiving the adults around me as unreliable, and without it I felt I wouldn't have survived. I cared deeply for everyone in my family, but in the end I depended on myself.
As you discover what strength you can draw from your community in this world from which it stands apart, look outward as well as inward. Build bridges instead of walls.
There are uses to adversity, and they don't reveal themselves until tested. Whether it's serious illness, financial hardship, or the simple constraint of parents who speak limited English, difficulty can tap unexpected strengths.
Lawsuits are rare and catastrophic experiences for the vast majority of men, and even when the catastrophe ensues, the controversy relates most often not to the law, but to the facts. In countless litigations, the law Is so clear that judges have no discretion.
I will not say with Lord Hale, that "The Law will admit of no rival" . . . but I will say that it is a jealous mistress, and requires a long and constant courtship. It is not to be won by trifling favors, but by lavish homage.
The critical point is that the Constitution places the right of silence beyond the reach of government.
Statutes authorizing unreasonable searches were the core concern of the framers of the 4th Amendment.
The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and injure those whom the state, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity.
Litigation is the pursuit of practical ends, not a game of chess.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.