My goal is to try to get people into a state of generalized agnosticism, not agnosticism about God alone, but agnosticism about everything.
Robert Anton WilsonRead
To work for libertarianism - to oppose the growth of government and aid the liberation of the individual - used to be an idealistic choice taken for purely idealistic reasons. Now it is an act of intelligent and almost desperate self-defense.
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes that advocating for libertarianism has shifted from a noble ideal to a necessary act of self-defense against governmental overreach.
Robert Anton Wilson suggests that the pursuit of libertarianism, which involves opposing government expansion and fostering individual freedom, was once seen as an aspirational goal driven by idealism. However, in the current context, it has transitioned to a more pragmatic stance, where supporting these principles is a critical act of safeguarding personal liberties against increasing governmental control.
In practice
In a political rally discussing individual rights and freedom.
My goal is to try to get people into a state of generalized agnosticism, not agnosticism about God alone, but agnosticism about everything.
There is no governor anywhere. You are all absolutely free. There is no restraint that cannot be escaped. If anybody could go into dhyana at will, nobody could be controlled - by fear of prison, by fear of whips or electroshock, by fear of death, even. All existing society is based on keeping those fears alive, to control the masses. Ten people who know would be more dangerous than a million armed anarchists.
I see anarchism as the theoretical ideal to which we are all gradually evolving to a point where everybody can tell the truth to everybody else and nobody can get punished for it. That can only happen without hierarchy and without people having the authority to punish other people.
The abandoned infant's cry is rage, not fear.
The only way to stave off boredom, in a complex domesticated primate like humankind, is to increase one's intelligence. This is not appealing to the average primate, who instead invents emotional games (soap opera and grand opera dramatics).
If one can only see things according to one's own belief system, one is destined to become virtually deaf, dumb, and blind.
The person I am now, compared with the person in the dream, has been baffled and defeated and only supposes he enjoys a full life. In the dreams, I see what a full life really consists of, and it is not what I really have.
Where are my sensations? They have melted into... me, and what is this me, this self, but the sum of these evaporated sensations?
Religion survives because it answers three questions that every reflective person must ask. Who am I? Why am I here? How then shall I live?
Some people take the view that we happen by accident. I think that there is something much deeper, of which we have very little inkling at the moment.
Does a rake deserve to possess anything of worth, since he chases everything in skirts and then imagines he can successfully hide his shame by slandering [women in general]?
Belief is with them mechanical, voluntary: they believe what they are paid for - they swear to that which turns to account. Do you suppose, that after years spent in this manner, they have any feeling left answering to the difference between truth and falsehood?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.