Hire people smarter than you are and encourage them to bloom.
Ben BradleeRead
As long as a journalist tells the truth, in conscience and fairness, it is not his job to worry about consequences. The truth is never as dangerous as a lie in the long run. I truly believe the truth sets men free.
Interpretation
A journalist's responsibility is to report the truth, regardless of potential fallout, as honesty ultimately liberates individuals.
Ben Bradlee emphasizes the paramount importance of truthfulness in journalism. He argues that while there might be immediate consequences for revealing the truth, in the long term, honesty fosters freedom and is far less detrimental than deception. A journalist should prioritize authenticity and fairness over the fear of repercussions, supporting the idea that truth strengthens society.
In practice
In a speech about media ethics, one could quote this to highlight the importance of truth in journalism.
Hire people smarter than you are and encourage them to bloom.
The really tough thing would have been to decide to take Woodward and Bernstein off the story. They were carrying the coal for us - in that their stories were right.
It changes your life, the pursuit of truth.
Sure, some journalists use anonymous sources just because they’re lazy, and I think editors ought to insist on more precise identification even if they remain anonymous.
Sometimes I am convinced there is nothing wrong with this country that couldn't be cured by the magical implantation of ethical standards on us all - leaders and followers. Until that becomes doable, the Center for Public Integrity is just about the best thing we have going for us.
Nothing's riding on this, except the First Amendment to the Constitution, freedom of the press and maybe the future of the country. Not that any of that matters, but if you guys f-k up again, I'm gonna get mad.
How do we get out of our small mind? When we enquire into the core of our existence. What is life? Who am I? This spirit of self-inquiry can awaken something inside you.
To be a philosophical sceptic is, in a man of letters, the first and most essential to being a sound, believing Christian.
So what is the difference between someone who willfully indulges in sexual pleasures while ignoring the Bible on moral purity and someone who willfully indulges in the selfish pursuit of more and more material possessions while ignoring the Bible on caring for the poor? The difference is that one involves a social taboo in the church and the other involves the social norm in the church.
Without God man has no reference point to define himself. 20th century philosophy manifests the chaos of man seeking to understand himself as a creature with dignity while having no reference point for that dignity.
We know only that we are living in these bodies and have a vague idea, because we have heard it, and because our faith tells us so, that we possess souls. As to what good qualities there may be in our souls, or who dwells within them, or how precious they are, those are things which seldom consider and so we trouble little about carefully preserving the soul's beauty.
The most virtuous are those who content themselves with being virtuous without seeking to appear so.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.