Language and words for psychopaths are only word deep; there is no emotional colouring behind it. A psychopath can use a word like, ‘I love you’ but it means nothing more to him than if he said, ‘I’ll have a cup of coffee.
Many psychopaths describe the traditional treatment programmes as finishing schools where they hone their skills. Where they find out that there are lots of techniques they had not thought about before.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote suggests that treatment programs can inadvertently help psychopaths refine their manipulative behaviors rather than rehabilitate them.
In this quote, Robert D. Hare asserts that traditional treatment programs designed to rehabilitate psychopathic individuals can sometimes serve as venues for them to enhance their manipulative skills. Instead of facilitating genuine healing or change, these programs may inadvertently instruct them on various techniques for deception and manipulation that they had not previously considered, effectively functioning as 'finishing schools' for their harmful behaviors.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a psychological seminar discussing the challenges of treating antisocial behavior.
More from Robert D. Hare
All quotes →Psychopaths are social predators, and like all predators, they are looking for feeding grounds. Wherever you get power, prestige and money, you will find them.
Measurement and categorization are, of course, fundamental to any scientific endeavor, but the implications of being able to identify psychopaths are as much practical as academic. To put it simply, if we can't spot them, we are doomed to be their victims, both as individuals and as a society.
Not all psychopaths are in prison - some are in the boardroom.
A psychopath can tell what you're thinking but what they don't do is feel what you feel. These are people without a conscience.
Similar quotes
The only thing that disturbs me is that many psychopaths say they had a very happy childhood.
I think the relationship between social-dominance orientation in people and the extent to which they're made uncomfortable by ambiguity and novelty is really important. Better a stable world that's familiar, in which I'm doing pretty poorly, than dealing with all the ambiguity of a changing world.
I'm fascinated by the ways in which people express themselves, because their responses are often counter to what they're actually feeling. Like when they're frightened, they tend to freeze. When they're angry, it doesn't always come out as volume. There are wonderful contradictions in the way that people express their emotions.
We like to think there is this core of human nature – that good people can't do bad things, and that good people will dominate over bad situations. Infact, when we look at the Stanford prison studies, that we put good people in an evil place, and we saw who won. Well, the sad message in this, is in this case is the evil place won over the good people.
People don't just get upset. They contribute to their upsetness. They always have the power to think, and to think about their thinking, and to think about thinking about their thinking, which the goddamn dolphin, as far as we know, can't do. Therefore they have much greater ability to change themselves than any other animal has, and I hope that REBT teaches them how to do it.
In psychology and behavioral economics, people have shown that if you just describe options in a certain way, or make some features of a situation salient, you can get people to do and even see what you want. You don't have to be a Jedi to manipulate people's attention.