In the lexicon of the political class, the word 'sacrifice' means that the citizens are supposed to mail even more of their income to Washington so that the political class will not have to sacrifice the pleasure of spending it.
George WillRead
Marijuana legalization's income may help fund education, prevention and treatment programs for harder drugs. What's clear is that the four-decade-old U.S.-backed war on drugs is not working, and that it's producing tens of thousands of dead across the hemisphere, without significant gains in reducing consumption. Experimenting with new weapons to weaken the cartels may be better than doing nothing.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the failures of the war on drugs and suggests that marijuana legalization could provide funding for better solutions.
Andres Oppenheimer's quote critiques the long-standing U.S. war on drugs, asserting that it has failed to decrease drug consumption and has resulted in numerous casualties. He proposes that legalizing marijuana might generate revenue to support education, prevention, and treatment programs for more dangerous substances, suggesting that finding innovative approaches to address drug-related issues is essential.
In practice
In a discussion about drug policy reform, one might cite this quote to emphasize the need for new strategies.
In the lexicon of the political class, the word 'sacrifice' means that the citizens are supposed to mail even more of their income to Washington so that the political class will not have to sacrifice the pleasure of spending it.
The Prime Minister has an absolute genius for putting flamboyant labels on empty luggage.
I think the truth is that the Labour Party isn't believed any more because people suspect it will say anything to get votes. The rebuilding of some radical alternatives to Thatcherism - and by that I mean all-party Thatcherism - will require us to do some very difficult things
In the hands of politicians grand designs achieve nothing but new forms of the old misery.
If you're going to have any kind of political opposition in the 21st century, then it has to be as fundamentally liquid as the rapidly changing society we're living in.
You feel sometimes when you hear analysts and knowledgeable people talking about Iran that they fear so much about the survival of the regime, because deep down it's not a legitimate regime, it doesn't represent the will of the people, it's kind of morphed into kind of a military theocracy.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.