The individual is far better-positioned to wait patiently for the right pitch while paying no regard to what others are doing, which is almost impossible for professionals.
Jeremy GranthamRead
The market is incredibly inefficient and capable on rare occasions of being utterly dysfunctional. And people have a really hard time getting their brain around that fact. They want to believe that it's approximately efficient almost all the time, and it simply isn't true.
Interpretation
The market often fails to operate efficiently, yet people struggle to accept this reality.
This quote by Jeremy Grantham emphasizes the inherent inefficiencies and dysfunctions present in the market, contradicting the popular belief that markets are consistently efficient. It suggests that individuals have a cognitive bias towards believing in the market's efficiency, which can lead to misguided assumptions and decision-making.
In practice
During a financial seminar discussing market behaviors.
The individual is far better-positioned to wait patiently for the right pitch while paying no regard to what others are doing, which is almost impossible for professionals.
We live on a finite planet. We have finite resources, and we're running out of good, arable land.
When it comes to portfolios, my personal advice is for anyone who can, put money into forestry or farmland. Long term, you would probably never come near their returns in the stock market. In the world that I see, land is golden.
There is no single theory that is used in economics that considers the finite nature of resources. It's shocking.
With neoliberalism discredited and austerity failed, we need to rewrite the rules of the economy once again. But this time in the right way. We need rules that focus on long-term economic growth, and the only kind of sustainable prosperity is shared prosperity.
In a very weak economy, when you say 'cut government spending,' what you mean is you're laying off school teachers and you're de-funding various programs that put money into the economy. This means you have more unemployed people that then draw unemployment benefits and don't pay taxes.
The most insidious thing about trickle-down economics is not the claim that if the rich get richer, everyone is better off. It is the claim made by those who oppose any increase in the minimum wage that if the poor get richer, that will be bad for the economy. This is nonsense.
I'm quite worried about the fiscal imbalances that we've got and what that might mean in terms of financial crisis ahead.
Living capital, which has the special capacity to continuously regenerate itself, is ultimately the source of all real wealth. To destroy it for money, a simple number with no intrinsic value, is an act of collective insanity - which makes capitalism a mental, as well as physical pathology.
With the exception of the instinct of self-preservation, the propensity for emulation is probably the strongest and most alert and persistent of the economic motives proper.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.