A dogmatic belief in objective value is necessary to the very idea of a rule which is not tyranny or an obedience which is not slavery.
Men became scientific because they expected Law in Nature, and they expected Law in Nature because they believed in a Law Giver.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote suggests that the pursuit of science is rooted in the belief that the universe operates under consistent laws, which in turn implies a higher power or Law Giver.
C. S. Lewis argues that the advancement of scientific thought is not merely based on empirical observation, but is deeply intertwined with the philosophical belief in an underlying order or law that governs the natural world. This expectation of lawfulness is based on the belief in a divine creator, who establishes these laws, driving humanity to explore and understand the universe scientifically.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a speech about the relationship between faith and science, one could quote Lewis to illustrate how science is often influenced by theological beliefs.
More from C. S. Lewis
All quotes βI enjoyed my breakfast this morning, and I think that was a good thing and do not think it was condemned by God. But I do not think myself a good man for enjoying it.
Aim at heaven and you will get earth thrown in. Aim at earth and you get neither.
Forgiving and being forgiven are two names for the same thing. The important thing is that a discord has been resolved.
I pray because I can't help myself. I pray because I'm helpless. It doesn't change God - it changes me.
The instrument through which you see God is your whole self. And if a man's self is not kept clean and bright, his glimpse of God will be blurred
Similar quotes
I would say the biggest handicap we have right now is some nutcases in our country that don't believe in global warming. I think they are going to change their position because of pressure from individuals, because the evidence of the ravages of global warming is already there.
Humans are natural-born scientists. When we're born, we want to know why the stars shine. We want to know why the sun rises.
If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. But I can find no such case.
The apex of mathematical achievement occurs when two or more fields which were thought to be entirely unrelated turn out to be closely intertwined. Mathematicians have never decided whether they should feel excited or upset by such events.
I wouldn't have thought that a wrong theory should lead us to understand better the ordinary quantum field theories or to have new insights about the quantum states of black holes.
Only 20 percent of our longevity is genetically determined. The rest is what we do, how we live our lives and increasingly the molecules that we take. It's not the loss of our DNA that causes aging, it's the problems in reading the information, the epigenetic noise.