Political activism is not failing because people are too busy watching cat videos online, but because of a fundamental collapse of citizen leverage on institutions of power like governments and corporations.
Zeynep TufekciRead
You might be tempted to think that China has a Streisand-effect problem, in which trying to censor an event creates even more publicity. But that assumes the Chinese government doesn't understand the Streisand effect, and that can't be right, because if one government understands attention dynamics online, it's China's.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the Chinese government's awareness of the unintended consequences of censorship, particularly in the digital age.
Zeynep Tufekci's quote addresses the complex nature of censorship, using the example of the Streisand effect, which describes how attempts to suppress information can lead to greater public interest. It suggests that the Chinese government is not naive about how online attention works, implying that their actions are calculated and strategic rather than misguided attempts at control.
In practice
In a discussion on media control, this quote can illustrate the paradox of censorship.
Political activism is not failing because people are too busy watching cat videos online, but because of a fundamental collapse of citizen leverage on institutions of power like governments and corporations.
Given exponential growth dynamics of infectious diseases, containing an epidemic is straightforward early on, but nearly impossible once a disease spreads among a population.
Remember, the Internet did not create freedom of speech; in theory, we always had freedom of speech - it's just that it often went along with the freedom to be ignored. People had no access to the infrastructure to be heard.
Attention, to a terrorist group, is often what the well-meaning, outraged response is to your two-bit Internet troll: it is the food that feeds them.
Much of what ails our modern life is exactly because we reduce the value of a human being to a number, say salary or consumer power.
A 'fair' fight between non-equals is not fair, and being blind to power is an implicit endorsement of the powerful.
Remember that a civilized nation cannot just have one party; if there were only one party, this would merely be a dictatorship. Politics could not advance.
I hope I'm wrong, but I am afraid that Iraq is going to turn out to be the greatest disaster in American foreign policy - worse than Vietnam, not in the number who died, but in terms of its unintended consequences and its reverberation throughout the region.
Fighting corruption is not just good governance. It's self-defense. It's patriotism.
As with the Christian religion, the worst advertisement for Socialism is its adherents.
Voting rights are preservative of all other rights.
In inner-party politics, these methods lead, as we shall yet see, to this: the party organization substitutes itself for the party, the central committee substitutes itself for the organization, and, finally, a dictator substitutes himself for the central committee.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.