Money isn't automatically freedom. You need to look carefully at what you're doing to earn the money before you can conclude that you are, in practice, free. This is a cost-benefit analysis we should all perform on our own lives.
Interpretation
True freedom is not just having money; it requires a thoughtful analysis of how we earn it.
This quote by John Lanchester emphasizes that wealth alone does not guarantee freedom. It prompts us to reflect on our methods of earning money and consider the implications of our work on our personal freedom, suggesting that a thorough cost-benefit analysis of our lives is essential for achieving genuine liberation.
In practice
This quote would be perfect for a discussion on personal finance during a seminar.
One of the things I have noticed about my novels is that they all concern people who can't quite bring themselves to tell the truth about their own lives... I've come to realise that this interest in damaged, untellable stories comes from my parents.
Nobody in the developing world is going to take, as an answer to their aspirations, the developed world's reply: 'Sorry, you can't; we've already used it all up.' To earn the right to look the developing world in the eye and start this conversation, we need a reassessment of how we live and what we want.
Rising inequality is not a law of nature - it's not even a law of economics. It is a consequence of political and economic arrangements, and those arrangements can be changed.
The financial system in its current condition poses an existential threat to Western democracy far exceeding any terrorist threat.
The person doing the worrying experiences it as a form of love; the person being worried about experiences it as a form of control.
Our culture made a virtue of living only as extroverts. We discouraged the inner journey, the quest for a center. So we lost our center and have to find it again.
My country's main exports are stolen cars and sadness.
I think the 'Terminator' idea is a reasonable one - that is that one day the Internet becomes self-aware and simply says that humans are in the way. After all, if you meet an ant hill and you're making a 10-lane super highway, you just pave over the ants. It's not that you don't like the ants, it's not that you hate ants; they are just in the way.
As we dread any disease that undermines the health of the body, so should we deplore contention, which is a corroding canker of the spirit.
A finite game is played for the purpose of winning, an infinite game for the purpose of continuing the play.
Again: there is nothing inherently superior about resistance. All our claims for the righteousness of resistance rest on the rightness of the claim that the resisters are acting in the name of justice. And the justice of the cause does not depend on, and is not enhanced by, the virtue of those who make the assertion. It depends first and last on the truth of a description of a state of affairs that is, truly, unjust and unnecessary.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.