Never limit yourself because of others' limited imagination; never limit others because of your own limited imagination.
When I left NASA, I was looking at how you could use space technologies for developing countries' work.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Mae Jemison reflects on her departure from NASA, focusing on the potential of space technologies to benefit developing countries.
In this quote, Mae Jemison expresses her vision for applying the advancements in space technologies to solve challenges faced by developing countries. She emphasizes the importance of using scientific progress to improve life on Earth and how innovations from space exploration can be repurposed for social development, inspiring others to consider the broader applications of technology beyond its original context.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a speech about innovation at a technology conference, I can quote Mae Jemison to highlight the importance of practical applications of scientific advancements.
More from Mae Jemison
All quotes βGreatness can be captured in one word: lifestyle. Life is God's gift to you, style is what you make of it.
To survive as a species on this planet, we're going to have to see ourselves as Earthlings.
We look at science as something very elite, which only a few people can learn. That's just not true. You just have to start early and give kids a foundation. Kids live up, or down, to expectations.
Intuitive versus analytical? That's a foolish choice. It's foolish, just like trying to choose between being realistic or idealistic. You need both in life.
The reality is the majority of us will not get off this planet. So the long run is, some kind of space exploration has to benefit us here on Earth.
Similar quotes
An experiment is a question which science poses to Nature and a measurement is the recording of Nature's answer.
There is enough information capacity in a single human cell to store the Encyclopedia Britannica, all 30 volumes of it, three or four times over.
It {Darwin's theory of evolution] was a concept of such stunning simplicity, but it gave rise, naturally, to all of the infinite and baffling complexity of life. The awe it inspired in me made the awe that people talk about in respect of religious experience seem, frankly, silly beside it. I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day.
My own field of paleontology has strongly challenged the Darwinian premise that life's major transformations can be explained by adding up, through the immensity of geological time, the successive tiny changes produced generation after generation by natural selection.
It is hardly possible to maintain seriously that the evil done by science is not altogether outweighed by the good. For example, if ten million lives were lost in every war, the net effect of science would still have been to increase the average length of life.
Science can lift people out of poverty and cure disease. That, in turn, will reduce civil unrest.