The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention argues that no two countries that are both part of the same global supply chain will ever fight a war as long as they are each part of that supply chain.
Thomas FriedmanRead
Natural gas emits only half the carbon dioxide of coal when burned, but if methane leaks when oil companies extract it from the ground in a sloppy manner - methane is far more potent a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide - it can wipe out all the advantages of natural gas over coal.
Interpretation
Natural gas can be a cleaner energy source than coal, but methane leaks can negate its benefits.
This quote highlights the environmental implications of using natural gas instead of coal. While natural gas produces less carbon dioxide when burned, methane, which can leak during extraction, is significantly more harmful to the environment as a greenhouse gas. Therefore, if proper extraction practices are not followed, the potential climate benefits of natural gas over coal can be diminished.
In practice
In a speech about climate policy, a politician might use this quote to emphasize the importance of careful energy extraction practices.
The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention argues that no two countries that are both part of the same global supply chain will ever fight a war as long as they are each part of that supply chain.
When it comes to dealing with the world's climate and energy challenges, I have a simple rule: change America, change the world.
The hidden hand of the market will never work without a hidden fist -- McDonald's cannot flourish without McDonnell Douglas, the builder of the F-15. And the hidden fist that keeps the world safe for Silicon Valley's technologies is called the United States Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps.
Do you know what my favorite renewable fuel is? An ecosystem for innovation.
If you don't visit the bad neighborhoods, the bad neighborhoods are going to visit you.
Inspiring conduct has so much more of an impact than coercing it.
Doctors, dressed up in one professional costume or another, have been in busy practice since the earliest records of every culture on earth. It is hard to think of a more dependable or enduring occupation, harder still to imagine any future events leading to its extinction.
The science shows that the best way to use money is to take the issue of money off the people. Pay people enough so that money isn't an issue, and they can focus on doing great work.
Everyone is trying to jump on the biomimic bandwagon. But a cork floor is not biomimicry. Neither is using bacteria to clean water.
The world today is made, it is powered by science; and for any man to abdicate an interest in science is to walk with open eyes towards slavery.
Does anyone believe that the difference between the Lebesgue and Riemann integrals can have physical significance, and that whether say, an airplane would or would not fly could depend on this difference? If such were claimed, I should not care to fly in that plane.
Long intervals frequently elapse between the discovery of new principles in science and their practical application... Those intellectual qualifications, which give birth to new principles or to new methods, are of quite a different order from those which are necessary for their practical application.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.