Man is the only creature disposed to kill huge numbers of members of his own species, and his instrument is usually the state.
Joseph SobranRead
There has never been a humane communist regime. Marxism is inherently totalitarian. It recognizes no moral limits on the state. It’s the most convenient ideology for aspiring tyrants; it also retains its appeal for intellectuals, who have proved equally skillful at rationalizing abuses of power and at exculpating themselves.
Interpretation
This quote critiques Marxism as a totalitarian ideology that enables tyranny, reflecting on its moral implications.
Joseph Sobran's quote expresses the belief that Marxism, by its very nature, allows for totalitarianism and lacks moral constraints on authority. He suggests that this ideology is attractive not only to those seeking power but also to intellectuals who can justify and excuse the oppressive actions of such regimes, revealing a deep skepticism about the compatibility of Marxism with humane governance.
In practice
During a debate on political ideologies, one might quote Sobran to emphasize the dangers of unfettered governmental power.
Man is the only creature disposed to kill huge numbers of members of his own species, and his instrument is usually the state.
The prospect of a government that treats all its citizens as criminal suspects is more terrifying than any terrorist. And even more frightening is a citizenry that can accept the surrender of its freedoms as the price of "freedom".
We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done.
Ask most people who live in a home and have a mortgage on it whether they own their own home and the answer is almost guaranteed to be a resounding 'yes'. Yet it's the wrong answer. Technically speaking, until they have paid the mortgage off, they don't own it. Herein lies the difference between reality and illusion, between ownership and control. This confusion lies not only at the individual level, but also at the heart of government thinking.
I was unique in that I was a kind of black that white people could accept. I was their daydream. I had the worst kind of acceptance because it was never for how great I was or what I contributed. It was because of the way I looked.
At a certain point, what people mean when they use a word becomes its meaning.
We live in an age in which there is no heroic death.
We forfeit three-quarters of ourselves in order to be like other people.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.