There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
Noam ChomskyRead
Nobody should have any illusions. The United States has essentially a one-party system and the ruling party is the business party.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the dominance of business interests in the political system of the United States, suggesting a lack of genuine political diversity.
Noam Chomsky's quote expresses the idea that the American political landscape is largely controlled by a single party that primarily serves business interests, rather than representing a wide range of public opinions or needs. This perspective underscores the notion that political decisions are often influenced more by corporate power than by democratic ideals or the will of the people.
In practice
A political debate where the impact of corporate funding on campaign strategies is discussed.
There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
In the absence of sound oversight,responsible businesses are forced to compete against unscrupulous and underhanded businesses, who are unencumbered by any restrictions on activities that might harm the environment, or take advantage of middle-class families, or threaten to bring down the entire financial system.
I would not look to the U.S. Constitution if I were drafting a constitution in 2012.
Because so many voters happen to be illiterate, India invented the party symbol, so that voters who could not read the name of their candidate could vote for him or her anyway by recognizing the symbol under which they campaigned.
The idea that you can merchandise candidates for high office like breakfast cereal - that you can gather votes like box tops - is, I think, the ultimate indignity to the democratic process.
Elections aren't just about who votes but who doesn't vote.
Populism has had as many incarnations as it has had provocations, but its constant ingredient has been resentment, and hence whininess. Populism does not wax in tranquil times; it is a cathartic response to serious problems. But it always wanes because it never seems serious as a solution.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.