In a constitutional democracy the moral content of law must be given by the morality of the framer or legislator, never by the morality of the judge.
The notion that Congress can change the meaning given a constitutional provision by the Court is subversive of the function of judicial review; and it is not the less so because the Court promises to allow it only when the Constitution is moved to the left.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote critiques the idea that Congress can alter the judicial interpretation of the Constitution, suggesting this undermines judicial review.
Robert Bork's quote addresses the tension between legislative power and judicial interpretation within the context of the U.S. Constitution. He argues that if Congress has the ability to redefine constitutional provisions as interpreted by the Court, it threatens the very principle of judicial review. Bork expresses concern over the potential manipulation of constitutional meanings, particularly when such interpretations are aligned with a shift in progressive political ideology, highlighting the necessity for an independent judiciary to uphold constitutional integrity.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
This quote can be used in a political debate to emphasize the importance of judicial independence.
More from Robert Bork
All quotes →A society deadened by a smothering network of laws while finding release in moral chaos is not likely to be either happy or stable.
When a judge assumes the power to decide which distinctions made in a statute are legitimate and which are not, he assumes the power to disapprove of any and all legislation, because all legislation makes distinctions
Similar quotes
The only serious question in life is whether to kill yourself or not.
At the beginning of my career, I visited a Sudanese refugee camp in Uganda and saw a two-year-old girl die before my eyes. The technical term for what this girl experienced, when you are too thin and malnourished for your size, is childhood wasting. And it was, indeed, a waste. A young life - with all its potential - gone forever.
The greatest thing in this world is not so much where we stand as in what direction we are moving.
Not selfishness, but precisely the absence of a self. Look at them. The man who cheats and lies, but preserves a respectable front. He knows himself to be dishonest, but others think he’s honest and he derives his self-respect from that, second-hand. The man who takes credit for an achievement which is not his own. He knows himself to be mediocre, but he’s great in the eyes of others.
Strange a God who mouths Golden Rules and forgiveness, then invented hell; who mouths morals to other people and has none Himself; who frowns upon crimes yet commits them all; who created man without invitation, then tries to shuffle the responsibility for man's acts upon man, instead of honorably placing it where it belongs, upon Himself; and finally with altogether divine obtuseness, invites this poor, abused slave to worship Him!
I don't want to be immortal through my works. I want to be immortal by not dying.