As our own species is in the process of proving, one cannot have superior science and inferior morals. The combination is unstable and self-destroying.
Nowhere in space will we rest our eyes upon the familiar shapes of trees and plants, or any of the animals that share our world. Whatsoever life we meet will be as strange and alien as the nightmare creatures of the ocean abyss, or of the insect empire whose horrors are normally hidden from us by their microscopic scale.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote highlights the unfamiliarity and strangeness of life beyond Earth compared to the known wildlife of our planet.
Arthur C. Clarke reflects on the vastness of space and the alien nature of potential life forms that we may encounter beyond our planet. He contrasts them with the familiar flora and fauna of Earth, suggesting that any extraterrestrial life may be as bizarre and incomprehensible as the terrifying creatures of the deep sea or the often-overlooked horror of microscopic life. This illustrates the awe and mystery of the universe and the possibility of encountering life forms that are drastically different from our own.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a science class discussing the possibilities of extraterrestrial life, this quote can illustrate the unknown diversity in the universe.
More from Arthur C. Clarke
All quotes βIt has yet to be proven that intelligence has any survival value.
The best measure of a man's honesty isn't his income tax return. It's the zero adjust on his bathroom scale.
It was the mark of a barbarian to destroy something one could not understand.
My favorite definition of an intellectual: 'Someone who has been educated beyond his/her intelligence'.
Never attribute to malevolence what is merely due to incompetence
Similar quotes
I don't walk into the lab in the morning thinking, 'I am a woman, and I will carry out an experiment that will conquer the world.' I am a scientist, not male or female. A scientist.
Of what use are the great number of petrifactions, of different species, shape and form which are dug up by naturalists? Perhaps the collection of such specimens is sheer vanity and inquisitiveness. I do not presume to say; but we find in our mountains the rarest animals, shells, mussels, and corals embalmed in stone, as it were, living specimens of which are now being sought in vain throughout Europe. These stones alone whisper in the midst of general silence.
A great part of its theories derives an additional charm from the peculiarity that important propositions, with the impress of simplicity on them, are often easily discovered by induction, and yet are of so profound a character that we cannot find the demonstrations till after many vain attempts; and even then, when we do succeed, it is often by some tedious and artificial process, while the simple methods may long remain concealed.
There are many people talking about access to space and, 'How can we make that cheaper? How can we turn that into a Southwest Airlines versus the big airlines?'
The future depicted in a good SF story ought to be in fact possible, or at least plausible. That means that the writer should be able to convince the reader (and himself) that the wonders he is describing really can come true... and that gets tricky when you take a good, hard look at the world around you.
Ageing is so many different things, and cells being able to self-renew is part of the picture but not all of it.