Our sense of justice depends on our sense of time. Justice is a phenomenon only of consciousness, because time spread out in a spatial succession is its very essence. And this is possible only in a spatial metaphor of time.
Julian JaynesRead
One does one's thinking before one knows what one is to think about.
Interpretation
Thinking precedes our awareness of what we are supposed to think about.
This quote by Julian Jaynes suggests that our cognitive processes often function unconsciously before we consciously recognize the subject matter we should contemplate. It emphasizes the complexity of thought and how our decision-making processes are sometimes initiated without our full awareness of the context or the content we are engaging with.
In practice
During a seminar on cognitive science, this quote could illustrate how our thoughts are formed.
Our sense of justice depends on our sense of time. Justice is a phenomenon only of consciousness, because time spread out in a spatial succession is its very essence. And this is possible only in a spatial metaphor of time.
Civilization is the art of living in towns of such size the everyone does not know everyone else.
Abstract words are ancient coins whose concrete images in the give and take of talk have worn away with use.
It is true we have won all our wars, but we have paid for them. We don't want victories anymore.
I am slow of speech and slow of tongue.
Cynics regarded everybody as equally corrupt... Idealists regarded everybody as equally corrupt, except themselves.
My faceless neighbor spoke up: βDonβt be deluded. Hitler has made it clear that he will annihilate all Jews before the clock strikes twelve.β I exploded: βWhat do you care what he said? Would you want us to consider him a prophet? His cold eyes stared at me. At last he said, wearily: βI have more faith in Hitler than in anyone else. He alone has kept his promises, all his promises, to the Jewish people.
The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants.
There are 3 questions that would destroy most of the arguments of the Left. The first is - compared to what? The second is - at what cost? And the third is - what hard evidence do you have?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.