One of the problems with defending free speech is you often have to defend people that you find to be outrageous and unpleasant and disgusting.
Interpretation
Defending free speech requires tolerance for ideas and individuals that may be offensive or disagreeable.
This quote by Salman Rushdie highlights the challenge of defending the principle of free speech, as it often involves supporting the rights of individuals whose views or actions we may find repugnant. It requires a commitment to uphold the fundamental right to express diverse and sometimes controversial opinions, even when they clash with our own values or sensibilities.
In practice
During a debate about censorship, this quote can be used to underline the importance of protecting free speech.
I've been fascinated by Machiavelli since I was very young. I've always felt that he had a bad rap from history, and that he was actually a person quite unlike what we now think of as Machiavellian. He was a republican. He disliked totalitarian government.
Killing people because you don't like their ideas - it's a bad thing.
faith without doubt is addiction
I am clearly vulnerable to these more passionate and volatile unstable relationships. I am trying to not be so vulnerable.
In India, as elsewhere in our darkening world, religion is the poison in the blood. Where religion intervenes, mere innocence is no excuse. Yet we go on skating around this issue, speaking of religion in the fashionable language of 'respect.' What is there to respect in any of this, or in any of the crimes now being committed almost daily around the world in religion's dreaded name?
Reality is a question of perspective; the further you get from the past, the more concrete and plausible it seems - but as you approach the present, it inevitably seems more and more incredible.
Both angels and demons are ignorant of the future, yet they make predictions. The angels do so when God reveals the future to them and commands them to prophesy, and what they prophesy comes to pass. Demons also make predictions, but these are only guesses based on what they see from afar.
Let go, and move closer to existence in silence and peace, in meditation.
To every object there correspond an ideally closed system of truths that are true of it and, on the other hand, an ideal system of possible cognitive processes by virtue of which the object and the truths about it would be given to any cognitive subject.
It's hard for me to view Baltimore outside the context of what Baltimore has always been in my mind: a violent place.
Fiction is a bridge to the truth that journalism can't reach.
Ed Koch will never "rest in peace." That was not his way. He was always nervously squirming, while making others squirm as well. Comfort was not his goal. He understood that to be a proud and assertive Jew meant never being able to leave a sigh of relief and say "it's over, we are at peace, we can now put down our guard and relax."
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.