One of the problems with defending free speech is you often have to defend people that you find to be outrageous and unpleasant and disgusting.
Interpretation
Defending free speech requires tolerance for ideas and individuals that may be offensive or disagreeable.
This quote by Salman Rushdie highlights the challenge of defending the principle of free speech, as it often involves supporting the rights of individuals whose views or actions we may find repugnant. It requires a commitment to uphold the fundamental right to express diverse and sometimes controversial opinions, even when they clash with our own values or sensibilities.
In practice
During a debate about censorship, this quote can be used to underline the importance of protecting free speech.
I've been fascinated by Machiavelli since I was very young. I've always felt that he had a bad rap from history, and that he was actually a person quite unlike what we now think of as Machiavellian. He was a republican. He disliked totalitarian government.
Killing people because you don't like their ideas - it's a bad thing.
faith without doubt is addiction
I am clearly vulnerable to these more passionate and volatile unstable relationships. I am trying to not be so vulnerable.
In India, as elsewhere in our darkening world, religion is the poison in the blood. Where religion intervenes, mere innocence is no excuse. Yet we go on skating around this issue, speaking of religion in the fashionable language of 'respect.' What is there to respect in any of this, or in any of the crimes now being committed almost daily around the world in religion's dreaded name?
Reality is a question of perspective; the further you get from the past, the more concrete and plausible it seems - but as you approach the present, it inevitably seems more and more incredible.
A bad peace is even worse than war.
Fascism is the stage reached after communism has proved an illusion.
My faith in the Constitution is whole, it is complete, it is total, and I am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminuation, the subversion, the destruction of the Constitution. It is reason and not passion which must guide our deliberations, guide our debate, and guide our decision.
Evolutionary naturalism takes the inherent limitations of science and turns them into a devastating philosophical weapon: because science is our only real way of knowing anything, what science cannot know cannot be real.
I contend that non-violent acts exert pressure far more effective than violent acts, for the pressure comes from goodwill and gentleness.
But this is the great danger America faces. That we will cease to be one nation and become instead a collection of interest groups: city against suburb, region against region, individual against individual. Each seeking to satisfy private wants.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.